Consequence-based moral theories.

 

 

Evaluate consequence-based moral theories.
Creating the perfect boss
Your company, Ye Old Paper Mill, recently experienced some organizational chart changes, mostly related to management positions. After posting low profits and even lower employment satisfaction scores, the CEO decided it was time for a change. The CEO, who prefers consequentialist views when it comes to ethical decisions, approached you, along with the rest of the human resources department, and tasked the team with weighing consequentialist ethical theories and selecting which theory would be best for potential managers. For this assessment, you will draft a proposal that addresses the following questions:

What are key features of consequentialist theories?
What are the differences between the consequentialist theories?
How does happiness and pleasure factor in to these theories? Remember employee satisfaction is at an all-time low.
What are the pros and cons of each view for the company if the majority of its employees would follow one of the particular theories?
Would it be possible for a manager, who follows a different ethical perspective, to effectively manage subordinates who follow a particular consequentialist theory?
Select and defend which consequentialist theory for management would be best for the company.
Your properly formatted proposal will need to include the following sections:
Introduction: Explain why you are sending this proposal. Provide an overview of the issue and discuss the task from the CEO.

Address the questions listed above with applicable support and research
Conclusion: In this part, you will wrap up the proposal and select and defend which consequentialist theory for management would be best for the company.

 

 

Sample Solution

Consequence-based moral theories

Consequentialism is an ethical theory that judges whether or not something is right by what its consequences are. Consequentialism is based on two principles: whether an act is right or wrong depends only on the results of that act; the more good consequences an act produces, the better or more right that act. The most famous version of this theory is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism provides a guiding framework of decision making rooted in social benefit which helps direct business toward more ethical behavior. Utilitarianism, as a consequentialist theory and when applied to business, emphasizes the greatest good (or profit) for the greater number of shareholders.

 

Could Watching Reality Shows Be Harmful?

GuidesorSubmit my paper for examination

circumstances and logical results article sampleIf an individual turns their TV on in practically any nation, in all probability the channels will be loaded up with various types of unscripted TV dramas. This is nothing unexpected, on the grounds that this sort of TV program has gotten incredibly well known in late decades. Such shows are engaging and compelling to watch, as they center not around anecdotal characters, however on genuine individuals put in various settings and circumstances. In any case, paying little heed to the diversion it conveys, an inquiry may emerge: is there something more to watching unscripted TV dramas than being engaged?

While assessing unscripted TV dramas, a few variables ought to be taken in thought. The “truth” that is generally appeared on TV isn’t a similar target reality we live in. Each unscripted TV drama has a center plan to which the conduct of its competitors is quelled—however the members are not obliged to act somehow, they despite everything follow the content, and their conduct is then assessed (by crowds, other show members, arbitrators, etc). “All TV appears, not simply unscripted TV dramas, help build situations that show how a few practices will be remunerated or rebuffed. The worry is that visit watchers of these shows will become familiar with these practices, consider them to be attractive and afterward model them in the genuine world,” says Dr. Brad Gorham, seat of the Communications Department at the S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications at Syracuse University (USA Today).

In the event that we attempt to make sense of what is so engaging about unscripted TV dramas, we can arrive at this resolution: it is the mortification and deriding of the competitors that makes individuals interested. In fact, on the off chance that we break down such a mainstream appear as American Idol, we will handily see numerous scenes of this program are devoted to ridiculing the hopefuls, whose performing capacities were lower contrasted with different members (which doesn’t really mean they are denied of ability, or are more awful in some other way). This can make a group of people (which for the most part comprises of youngsters) that rate and evaluate individuals dependent on their characteristics, for example, appearance or aptitudes; this model structures a strong reason for segregating conduct and an absence of resilience (eHow).

One more negative impact of unscripted TV dramas is a mutilated portrayal of connections between sexes. Numerous unscripted TV dramas address sexual topics, or portray connections dependent on embarrassments and battles. Connections on TV differentiate genuine ones: they will in general be less steady and amicable, they are sexualized, and for the most part planned for carrying greater prominence to those occupied with them. Since it is hard to control the entrance of underaged crowds to TV projects, youngsters and adolescents are presented to the dangers of building up an off-base view of connections dependent on what they see on TV, which is unsuitable (RFA.edu).

Despite the fact that unscripted TV dramas have gotten incredibly well known, it doesn’t mean they are gainful for their crowds. Or maybe regularly, these shows show good examples that depend on semi-fake conditions and situations. Be that as it may, these models are as yet observed as attractive by watchers. Likewise, mortification, which makes the premise of the diversion part in most of unscripted TV dramas, trains crowds to rate individuals dependent on their physical or mental characteristics, which can make a strong reason for separating conduct. Likewise, considering sexualized and disentangled delineations of sentimental connections as a general rule appears, one can guarantee these TV projects can cause distorted view of connections between various sexes in the psyches of young people, who for the most part make up the intended interest group of most of unscripted TV dramas.

References

Fahner, Micki. “The Real Effects of Reality TV.” USA Today College. N.p., 18 Apr. 2012. Web. 08 Sept. 2014.

“Negative Effects of Reality Shows.” EHow. Request Media, 07 Oct. 2010. Web. 08 Sept. 2014.

LeBoue, Sarah. “Unscripted television May Cause Deviant Sexual Behavior Among Teens.” RFA.edu. N.p., 01 Sept. 2014. Web. 08 Sept. 2014. .

school exposition, wellbeing article, web based life paper

3.4/5

NEED HELP?

Approach a specialist for FREE

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.