Consider the Lobster

“Consider the Lobster” (ethics of food choices)
Link: http://www.columbia.edu/~col8/lobsterarticle.pdf
who is the intended audience of the essay? is the essay effective? Is this essay credible? What is the article missing? How credible is the author?
To better answer these questions, be sure to find the following:
Who is the author, and why is this important?
When was the essay written, and why is this important?
What claim is the author making?
What kind of claim is the author making (fact, value, or policy)? How does the author support this claim?
What is the warrant that connects the claim and the support?
Take time to begin your Rhetorical Analysis essay. Be sure to watch the review videos on paraphrasing, intros and conclusions, and body paragraph development first. And remember, this essay should be at least 500 words.

 

Sample Solution

The essay “Consider the Lobster” by David Foster Wallace is intended for an audience interested in food choices and ethics. Wallace was a prominent American author and professor with a Ph.D in English which contributes to the credibility of his arguments (Columbia University, 2021). The essay was written in 2004 making it old enough that some aspects may need updating, but significant enough that it still offers valuable insight into ethical questions related to food.

In his article, Wallace argues that people should consider the suffering of animals when deciding what type of food to consume (Wallace 2004). He explains how lobsters are boiled alive due to their low intelligence and lack of neural pathways which would allow them to feel pain similar to humans(Wallace 2004). To address this issue he challenges readers not only to question why they make certain food choices but also suggests ways people can reduce animal suffering such as choosing more humane methods of killing animals or avoiding eating meat altogether (Wallace 2004).

Overall, the essay effectively explains why ethical considerations are important when selecting what we eat while providing credible evidence to support his claims. However, it could benefit from discussing how modern technology has made reducing animal suffering easier than ever before through practices such as lab-grown meats or plant-based alternatives. Additionally, more details on how individuals can research companies for their ethical standards would help further equip readers with proper tools when making decisions about where they purchase their groceries from . Despite this minor limitation however, Wallace’s credentials add significant credibility making it an overall effective piece.

at times supplanted by a quick n-bit convey spread viper. A n by n exhibit multiplier requires n2 AND doors, n half adders, and n2 , 2n full adders. The Variable Correction Truncated Multiplication technique gives a proficient strategy to re-ducing the power dissemination and equipment necessities of adjusted exhibit multipliers. With this strategy, the diagonals that produce the t = n , k least critical item pieces are disposed of. To make up for this, the AND doors that create the halfway items for section t , 1 are utilized as contributions to the changed adders in segment t. Since the k excess changed full adders on the right-hand-side of the cluster don’t have to create item bits, they are supplanted by adjusted decreased full adders (RFAs), which produce a convey, yet don’t deliver a total. To add the consistent that revises for adjusting mistake, k , 1 of the MHAs in the second column of the exhibit are changed to altered concentrated half adders (SHAs). SHAs are identical to MFAs that have an informat

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.