Consumer privacy protection

 

Consumer privacy protection has become essential in the digital age. Since the amount of attacks and data breaches continues to rise, organizations and businesses need to research, implement, and discover new ways in which to secure their privacy.
Complete the Hands-On Project 1-1 from the text (Examine Data Breaches). In a 500- to 750-word essay, make sure to address the following:
1. Briefly explain the fundamental concepts of information technology and cybersecurity. What social, ethical, and professional challenges are involved in protecting data? Provide one to two examples for each.
2. Can lost, discarded, or stolen government/business computers and PDAs influence key components of confidentiality, availability, and integrity? How? Considering the data stored on these devices, what main security objectives and processes should be put into place to prevent the disruption of data flow and intrusion?
3. What responsibilities do organizations or businesses have to consumers when there is a data breach? Are there cases where professionally a business/organization is not required to act, but ethically they should? Present a current example.
4. Can a consumer protect their own personal information? Can a consumer truly ensure their rights are being digitally protected? Explain your rationale.

Sample Solution

Consumer data continue to transform businesses, as companies become responsible for managing the data they collect. To find out what consumers think about the privacy and collection of data, McKinsey conducted a survey of 1,000 North American consumers. To determine their views on data collection, hacks and breaches, regulations, communications, and particular industries, we asked them pointed questions about their trust in the businesses they patronize. The responses reveal that consumers are becoming increasingly intentional about what types of data they share—and with whom. They are far more likely to share personal data that are a necessary part of their interactions with organizations.

by proving there is a common underlying causal process for each distinct effect. Second, Jackson uses evolution to prove his dualism. Polar bears have evolved to have a thick coat. This thickness makes the coat heavy. Thus, the polar bears experience what it is like to carry a heavy coat. This is clearly not conducive to survival. Therefore, from Darwin’s Theory we know that any evolved characteristics are either conducive to survival or a by-product of an evolutionary action that is conducive to survival. Jackson uses this support his argument against physicalism: “qualia are a by-product of certain brain processes that are conducive to survival” (Jackson). Third, Jackson emphasizes the relationships between how we know our minds through behavior. We only know about others’ minds through observing their behavior. So, we must ask: how can a person’s behavior accurately reflect that he has qualia unless they conclude that behavior is an outcome of qualia? This gives rise to the main weakness of Jackson’s view – there is no proper evidence for the refutation of epiphenomenal qualia. Another weakness of Jackson’s view is the lack of clarity of source. Where do these qualia come from? If not physical, then where? This brings into questions spirits and “upper powers,” such as God, the existence of which are heavily debated in the scientific community. Despite this, the validity of dualism (and the lack of proving dualism to be incorrect), is a strong argument and will continue to allow Jackson’s argument to be considered valid.

Because Jackson clearly refutes any existence of physicalism in his explanation of phenomenal qualia, and his argument is overall less problematic than the arguments of his opponents, I align more with Jackson’s knowledge argument than that of Lewis. Until the existence of the actual physical matter behind “what it is like” information is found, Jackson’s argument proves to be more valid than that of Lewis. Although I would like to think that everything involving humans can be linked back to the brain, I do believe that some things may never be explained.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.