Contingency theories

Choose one of the following contingency theories:

House’s Path Goal Theory (1971)
Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Theory (1977)
Kerr and Jermier’s Leadership Substitute Ideas (1978)
Yukl’s Multiple-Linkage Model (1989)
Fiedler and Garcia’s Cognitive Resource Theory (1987)
Discuss what is known about the theory from a research perspective. Do we know whether the ideas work or not? Are there any practical “strategic” recommendations for leaders based on that theory? Be sure to cite your sources using APA style.

What are considered to be the positive and negative consequences of using transformational leadership behaviors? What are the practical implications of using the transformational approach?

.2.1 The job exhaustion plays in Hamstring wounds

Schuermans, et al., (2014) evaluated the impact of activity has on the hamstring muscle bunch between football players who have and haven’t experienced a hamstring damage. The investigation utilized a fMRI to survey the distinctions pre and present exercise on mean to assess the impact exhaustion plays in the muscle co-appointment just as a re-damage hazard. The investigation found that players with past hamstring wounds made some speedier memories to weariness just as a huge increment (p<0.01) in metabolic movement in all the hamstring muscles (ST, Semitendinosus; BF, Biceps Femoris; SM, Semimembranosus). Schuermans, et al., (2014) found that there was an expansion in comparable actuation designs in the harmed hamstrings. This was investigated to have been caused to be a neurological compensatory initiation of the hamstring muscles with a background marked by hamstring wounds; prompting an expansion in weariness and higher danger of re-damage in rapid development and flighty stacking. The creator’s investigation connects to Greig and Siegler (2009) which found that over a time of a reproduced football coordinate that unpredictable hamstring quality diminished over the length of a mimicked coordinate, which imitates current writing on the timeframe of hamstring wounds in football.

These articles interface together as, Schumermans, et al., (2014) shows how the impact of past damage and weakness influences the actuation of the neuromuscular action, which is added to by Greig, et al., (2009) which underpins and measures the impact exhaustion in football; indicating that the most reduced unusual hamstring torque scores being predominant at 90 and 105 minutes.

These discoveries show that both weariness just as past damage are significant reasons for hamstring wounds. In this way, endeavors to decrease the impact weakness has over a bustling timetable will permit the players to perform more episodes of high force sessions, or aid the recuperation in the middle of two close matches will diminish the danger of damage. This lead to this investigation taking a gander at the impacts kinesio tape has on the recuperation time frame after the impact of weakness.

2.3 How does the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 2 Replicate a Football Match.

Football players spread between 10-13km, with players in the English Championship and Premier League run for 308m, and 248m separately with fast running (>19km/h) covering 803m and 601m individually (Bangsbo, 2014). This shows by and large just 8.67% (6.53%-11.11%) of a match is spent doing high power developments, where low force developments compensates for the rest.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.