Contraceptions


Did you receive information about contraception in school prior to college?
What grade level? What was taught?
How do you feel about contraception information being taught in the schools?
At what grade level do you think it should be taught, if at all?
Do you think this information is important and effective to the students being taught?
Do you think birth control, such as condoms, should be given to high school students at school?

Sample Answer

As a method of family planning, contraception is the intentional use of non-natural approaches or other procedures to deter pregnancy as a result of unprotected sexual affairs. Contraception comes in various forms like contraceptive pills, barrier methods, intrauterine devices that stops the fertilized ovum from implanting in the uterus among other methodologies. Interestingly, awareness on contraception is not easily and efficiently created among the youths and children because in most cases parents are somewhat shy and not readily willing to discuss sexual affairs with their children, especially in Africa. As a result, most youths know


Wrongdoing and discipline is a huge piece of society today just as the most disregarded. Robert Ferguson's book, Inferno: An Anatomy of American Punishment portrays the theme of wrongdoing and disciplines in the American equity framework. In his clarification, Ferguson likewise expounds on the point of the 'Discipline Regime.' The discipline system can be depicted as a lawful procedure to which an individual in the public arena is rebuffed. The gatherings that piece of the discipline system incorporate legal hearers, cops, examiners, judges, and prison guards. Every one of the individuals from the discipline system have a particular work in administrating a discipline to a person. The fundamental concentration in this paper will be the way the discipline system has directed discipline on account of Eric Garner. In particular, this paper will concentrate on the police's utilization of power, pointless power, dehumanization, coordinated effort with the indictment, and the jury's inclination, on account of Eric Garner.

The Eric Garner case all began from a video that was taped by a man named Ramsey Orta, who was sitting outside his home when the occurrence happened. The video started with a bothered and aggravated Eric Garner disclosing to three cops on how he separated a battle and was 'Disapproving of my business.' The police in the video stand apathetically simply leaning to Garners arguing story where he continued broadcasting his guiltlessness. Orta likewise attempts to portray the circumstance to the group of spectators by saying 'this person directly here is coercively attempting to bolt someone in the mood for separating a battle.' The video in the end slices to the police encompassing Garner which prompts him opposing capture by saying 'kindly don't contact me.' The circumstance raises immediately when a cop comes behind Garner and places him into a chock hold while simultaneously utilizing his weight to cut Garner down. At the point when Garner is cut down you can see a few cops' encompassing Garner while the NYPD Officer named David Pantaleo is as yet holding him in a strangle hold. As Garner is being compelled to lie on his stomach, you can hear Garner argue to the cops that 'I can't inhale.' Garner keeps on repeating that he couldn't inhale a sum of multiple times as the police hold holding him down. A few moments after Garner is cut down, the video shows a couple of cops analyzing Garner's dead looking body. Another video from an alternate observer shows an EMT checking on the off chance that Garner still had a heartbeat and, at that point giving the sign he was all the while relaxing. A few moments later Garner is put on a stretcher and kicks the bucket on his way to the clinic on June 17, 2014.

The principal subject concentrated on is the means by which police authority was being addressed on account of Eric Garner. In the start of the clasp when the police appear to simply be standing up to Garner, you can see that one of the officials comes up to the camera and advises Orta to leave the scene, to which Orta fights back by saying 'I live here.' This was an ideal model where the police felt their position was being addressed on the grounds that regardless of the reality New York laws enable spectators to tape cops (as long as it doesn't meddle with police obligation), the cop in the video tape still advised Orta to leave. This may be on the grounds that the cop felt just as his power was being placed into question in light of the fact that by recording the capture it causes it to appear that there is a sure measure of doubt and scorn being put on the cops, which may make the cop feel their authenticity as law authorization is being addressed. In this way, by recording him the cop may feel just as his authenticity as a cop is being placed into question since people in general can utilize these tapes as proof to show he may have violated the law.

The second way the police felt their power was being addressed was when Eric Garner began opposing capture. Regardless of whether it was correct or wrong that Garner opposed capture, the principle theme that ought to be centered around is the reason the cops were capturing Garner in any case. Based on what is thought about the case, it was discovered that the cops were defying Garner for selling untaxed cigarettes illicitly. Despite the fact that those activities were illicit, there was no proof found of Garner in any event, having 'untaxed' cigarettes in any case and there were additionally observers there that bolstered Garner's unique declaration that he was separating a battle (Christopher para 6). The officials who felt that they needed to capture Garner would not have called it quits from their case that Garner was selling cigarettes since that would cause them to need to concede that they were off base and by being in an inappropriate the officials may feel that general society will them untrustworthy. In this way, to legitimize their power the cops needed to demonstrate the talk of 'cops are in every case right' by not minding whether their activities were advocated in being correct or wrong at the same time, to demonstrate that they reserved the option to capture anybody they may accept is blameworthy by the ideals of simply being an a cop. Ferguson proceeds to portray this thought better by saying, 'The crude setting of law implementation powers officials toward oversimplified moral decisions as opposed to target stands. Circumstances immediately become dark or white, possibly in support' (Ferguson 107).

The second subject for this article will be the police's utilization of pointless power on account of Eric Garner. In the clasp, following a couple of moments of contending among Garner and the officials, you can see Officer Pantaleo come behind Garner and put him into what is by all accounts a strangle hold. As the cop applies the strangle hold, he utilizes his weight to cut Garner down. The issue with the strangle hold is that the NYPD has restricted the utilization of strangle holds since November 1993 (Friedersdorf para 2). The New York Medical Examiner likewise controlled Garners demise a manslaughter saying the strangle hold was the reason for Garner's passing (Nathan para 2). In spite of this implicating proof, Officer Pantaleo who put Garner into a strangle hold that in the end prompted his passing was still not arraigned by a Staten Island terrific jury regardless of it being an illicit move. Not just that, despite the fact that the utilization of strangle holds are unlawful in NY, there has still been around 1,128 claims over officials illicitly utilizing strangle holds (Meyers para 8). All in all, how can it be that cops are not being considered responsible for their over the top power regardless of there being video proof to demonstrate blame? The fundamental answers lies in how our discipline system works. As indicated by Ferguson, 'Power is permitted to the police since it is the speediest method to verify compliance in an emergency. Discipline can emerge out of them in a moment. So fundamental is the quality that, 'it is exceedingly uncommon that police activities including the utilization of power are checked on and made a decision by anybody by any stretch of the imagination" (Ferguson 105). As Ferguson recommends, 'power' by the police is utilized to verify dutifulness. The individuals who legitimize over the top power would likewise legitimize Pantaleo's activities since they think the official was defended in doing as such. This is fundamentally alluded to as an intrigue to power, where the general population is additionally ready to favor the official over cases like this in light of the fact that the official is even more an authentic master on issues of these sort. Along these lines, it is made to appear the police are legitimized in their activities since they are doing it for the flourishing of the network regardless of it being illegal. The issue here is that by not re-thinking the activities of officials like Pantaleo, we enable this sort of police foul play to turn out to be a piece of the framework and generally acknowledged which gives cops breathing space to be exempt from the rules that everyone else follows that they are relied upon to uphold (Ferguson 98).

The third point in Eric Garner's case was the dehumanization of the rebuffed. Dehumanization is the way toward deriding the adversary or causing them to appear to be not exactly human to legitimize harsh treatment towards them. This was predominant in the Garner's case in light of the fact that despite the fact that there was no genuine authentic explanation on Garner's capture other than he was associated with selling untaxed cigarettes, the principle supporters of official Pantaleo or supporters of the exacting discipline system legitimized Garners capture by belligerence, that since the 1980s Garner has been captured in excess of multiple times for attack, and ownership of maryjane (Meyers para 4). This revolves around the possibility that individuals like Garner who have violated the law, ought to merit discipline since they have relinquished their privileges of assurance by the law when they decided to deride themselves as offenders for overstepping the law. Along these lines, any unjustified activity that transpires ought to be acknowledged on the grounds that he decided to pursue the criminal way (Ferguson 54). This dehumanization of crooks makes an absence of compassion toward these individuals on account of their past activities and decides to overlook that these people still might be prepared to do great. Through this, people in general are always unable to understand the individual so as to feel compassion towards them. As Ferguson calls attention to, 'The issue isn't the disappointment of compassion, albeit frequently enough that is the situation, yet in the desensitized service of death that all other take part in without confronting the circumstance' (Ferguson 92). Along these lines, by dehumanizing individuals like Garner, the police can defend their unfeeling activities towards them by saying that any individual who doesn't pursue this framework can anticipate serious discipline, regardless of whether it violates laws during the time spent implementing this severe discipline system.

The fourth point on this is the manner by which the police and arraignment cooperate to uphold the severe discipline system. Following Eric Garners passing, Officer Panteleo was prosecuted in order to be arraigned by a terrific jury. Yet, at last, the stupendous jury decided not to arraign Pantaleo on the charges and let him go. The fascinating part about this was the fabulous jury records or proof utilized against Pantaleo are fixed in this way, we may never comprehend what proof was utilized by investigator Daniel Donovan and appeared