Cooperative Learning Reading by Johnson, Johnson, and Holubec (1994)

 

Respond to Questions:

 

Based on Cooperative Learning Reading by Johnson, Johnson, and Holubec (1994). Respond to the following:
Why use cooperative learning? What is the difference between formal cooperative learning and informal?
What are the 5 essential elements of cooperative learning? Discuss what each means in your own words and why it is important.
What do teachers need to know about monitoring and intervening when students are working in cooperative groups
2. Based on Gillies (2003) article on Structuring cooperative group work in classrooms, respond to the following:
What are the key research findings of cooperative learning? To what extent are these findings important for teachers, including yourself? Explain why.
What theoretical perspective(s) inform cooperative learning research and practice?
To what extent are findings in the reading similar to those reported in the short Video—Incorporating Cooperative Learning Effectively.
3.Read the Mirrored Tiles Lesson Plan and provide specific examples to explain in what ways each of the five key elements of cooperative learning are evidenced (or not) in the lesson plan. If any of the five elements are not addressed, point those out and explain your observation; then suggest a way that it might be addressed in the lesson plan.

4. Watch the Video Lesson—Where Cooperative Learning Works. Provide specific examples to explain in what ways each of the key five elements for cooperative learning are evidenced (or not) in the lesson. If any of the five elements are not addressed, point those out and explain your observation; then suggest a way that it might be addressed in the lesson. (As you observe the video, watch for teacher interactions with the groups (e.g., How does the teacher promote group interactions? Some teachers exchange communications with individual students (as if it was an individual task) rather than addressing the entire group when a member asks a question or when the teacher has a question or comment. This does not model cooperation in the group to the students.) https://online.fiu.edu/videos?vpvid=e5b0e4e8-87d0-4101-af01-165e32d05946

5. What questions or concerns do you still have about using cooperative learning through the implementation of the 5 key elements that other classmates may respond to?

 

Sample Solution

Cooperative learning is a student-centered, instructor-facilitated instructional strategy in which a small group of students is responsible for its own learning and the learning of all group members. Students interact with each other in the same group to acquire and practice the elements of a subject matter in order to solve a problem, complete a task or achieve a goal. Johnson, Johnson and Holubec (1993) state that in cooperative learning students can maximize their own and each other`s learning when they work together. Formal cooperative learning consists of students working together, for one class period to several weeks, to achieve shared learning goals and complete jointly specific tasks and assignments (Johnson, Johnson, & Holubec, 2008).

significant complaints raised to his contention named the Systems Reply, Robot Reply, and Brain Simulator Reply. In the wake of tending to and cautiously examining these, I will talk about Searle’s answers to these complaints and state whether I view his protests as palatable. To complete my paper, I will offer my own perspectives on why I don’t view the Chinese room as a convincing motivation to surrender the possibility that cognizance is best perceived as a kind of calculation.

In his paper “Psyches, Brains and Programs,” Searle examines the two limits of man-made: areas of strength for consciousness and feeble AI, and decides to focus on the previous asserting that PCs would be able or in the end will have mental capacities. Searle conjures the Chinese room psychological test to provoke the meaning areas of strength for of to at last reason that cerebrums cause brains and linguistic structure isn’t comparable to semantics. He requests that perusers envision an English-talking individual unequipped with Chinese proficiency being secured in a room. Here there are three bunches of Chinese composition, content and images with English directions, separately, and a bunch of decides in English that connect the initial two clumps to produce the third. In the event that a Chinese speaker passes notes with Chinese characters under the entryway for the English-speaker to answer, they will actually want to answer with the assets gave in the room. These reactions are undefined from that of a local Chinese speaker. This situation is undifferentiated from how a PC carries out its modified roles. With the utilization of this investigation, Searle intended to demonstrate that albeit a PC might have the option to have the option to impersonate a human all around ok to breeze through the Turing Assessment, this doesn’t mean the PC is keen. Searle excuses this case under the grounds that this individual is just adhering to directions and not figuring out the language.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.