Corporation’s board of directors have different roles and responsibilities

at
Categories
Tags

 

 

1. Top executives and members of a corporation’s board of directors have different roles and responsibilities. Traditionally, executives have been responsible for determining the firm’s strategic direction and implementing strategies to achieve it, whereas the board of directors has been responsible for monitoring and controlling managerial decisions and actions. Some argue that boards should become more involved with the formulation of a firm’s strategies. How would the board’s increased involvement in the selection of strategies affect a firm’s strategic competitiveness?
a. What evidence would you offer to support their position?

 

2. Explain why firms experience evolutionary cycles in which there is a fight between strategy and structure, punctuated with periods in which strategy and structure are reshaped. Provide examples of global firms that have experienced this pattern.
a. Choose a CEO of a prominent firm that you believe exemplifies the positive aspects of strategic leadership.
b. What actions does this CEO take that demonstrate effective strategic leadership?
c. What are the effects of those actions on the firm’s performance?

3. Discuss whether the term “corporate entrepreneurship” is an oxymoron. Can corporations—especially large ones—be innovative? Support your answer with examples.Use the Internet to find an example of two corporate innovations—one brought about through autonomous strategic behavior and one developed through induced strategic behavior. Which innovation seems to hold the most promise for commercial success, and why?

 

4. From this week’s discussion preparation, assess the potential pitfalls of passing the Small Business Lending Enactment Act as discussed in the article. Suggest how these pitfalls can be minimized.

5. From the discussion preparation, determine the key financial considerations for developing a customized security structure for the technology business that you researched. Include a brief description of the business.

6. Imagine you want to exit your business venture from the first assignment, Building Your Business Venture. Decide the strategy you would use to do so and provide a rationale for your response.
Outline an ideal timeline of the tasks needed to carry out the strategy. Provide a rationale for your response.. Your business : Betty’s, a mom and pop grocery store.

Sample Solution

nemy.’ This is additionally upheld by Frowe approach, which is much more upright than Vittola’s view however suggests similar plans: ‘can’t be rebuffed essentially for battling.’ This implies one can’t just rebuff another in light of the fact that they have been a warrior. They should be treated as sympathetically as could be expected. Notwithstanding, the circumstance is raised on the off chance that killing them can prompt harmony and security, inside the interests, everything being equal. In general, jus in bello proposes in wars, mischief must be utilized against soldiers, never against the blameless. Yet, eventually, the point is to lay out harmony and security inside the ward. As Vittola’s decision: ‘the quest for equity for which he battles and the safeguard of his country’ is the thing countries ought to be battling for in wars (Begby et al (2006b), Page 332). Consequently, albeit the present world has created, we can see not very different from the pioneer accounts on fighting and the traditionists, giving one more part of the hypothesis of the simply war. By and by, we can in any case presume that there can’t be one authoritative hypothesis of the simply war hypothesis on account of its normativity.

Jus post bellum
At long last, jus post bellum recommends that the moves we ought to make after a conflict (Frowe (2010), Page 208). Vittola, first and foremost, contends after a conflict, it is the obligation of the pioneer to judge how to manage the foe (Begby et al (2006b), Page 332).. Once more, proportionality is accentuated. For instance, the Versailles deal forced after the First World War is tentatively excessively brutal, as it was not all Germany’s problem for the conflict. This is upheld by Frowe, who communicates two perspectives in jus post bellum: Minimalism and Maximalism, which are very varying perspectives. Minimalists recommend a more tolerant methodology while maximalist, supporting the above model, gives a crueler methodology, rebuffing the foe both financially and strategically (Frowe (2010), Page 208). At the last occurrence, notwithstanding, the point of war is to lay out harmony security, so whatever should be done can be ethically legitimate, assuming it observes the guidelines of jus promotion bellum. All in all, simply war hypothesis is entirely contestable and can contend in various ways. In any case, the foundation of an equitable harmony is vital, making all war type circumstance to have various approaches to drawing closer (Frowe (2010), Page 227). By and by, the simply war hypothesis contains jus promotion bellum, jus in bello and jus post bellum, and it tends to be either ethically disputable or legitimate contingent upon the proportionality of the situation. Hence, there can’t be one conclusive hypothesis of the simply war yet just a hypothetical manual for show ho

This question has been answered.

Get Answer