Correctional facility staff hierarchy

at
Categories
Tags

 

After reviewing this week’s textbook reading and conducting research on the roles and challenges of corrections officers, you are to write a 3–5 page research paper in which you:
Explain the correctional facility staff hierarchy and the four main goals of correctional staff members, including the importance of each goal.
Outline the effectiveness of the five types of power available to correctional staff to manage inmate behavior.
Describe the factors contributing to correctional officer corruption within correctional facilities.
Report on the symptoms of stress for correctional officers and the associated underlying factors.
Summarize the effectiveness of the methods correctional officers use to cope with stress.
Use three sources to support your writing.
Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate.

Sample Solution

The correctional facility staff hierarchy consists of the warden, deputy or associate wardens, security personnel such as guards and officers, case managers, counselors, nurses, psychologists and administrators. Each of these roles is responsible for different aspects of the facility operations; however they all have four main goals in common which are maintaining control over inmates’ behavior, providing a secure environment for staff and visitors, helping offenders reform their lives through rehabilitation programs and finally ensuring that safety standards are met (Walker et al., 2016).

Maintaining order within an institution is perhaps the most important goal since it is essential to ensure that no breaches in security occur and that inmates follow the rules set out by both staff members as well as laws designed to protect those inside and outside prison walls (Lane 2010). This also involves preventing any violence between individuals or groups so that offenders can carry out their sentences without disruption while minimizing any potential harm towards themselves or others.

Providing a secure environment encompasses multiple tasks including controlling inmate movement throughout the facility as well as monitoring visitors in order limit potential contraband being smuggled into prison (Leone & Saint-Germain 2013). Additionally regular inspections need to conducted ensure that regulations regarding health codes are adhered to so everyone remains safe from infectious diseases or hazardous conditions.

Helping offenders reform their lives is critical since this prevents recidivism rates from increasing. Educating prisoners about life skills such as job training along with facilitating drug/alcohol treatment programs helps give them better opportunities once released back into society. Lastly fostering communication between inmates allows them develop strong relationships with one another which may reduce instances of criminal activity when they get out (Kabasakal 2018).

In conclusion ,the correctional facility staff hierarchy works together achieve four main goals: maintaining control over inmates’ behavior ,providing a secure environment for staff and visitors ,helping offenders reform their lives through rehabilitation programs ,and ensuring that safety standards are met. By achieving these objectives correctional institutions can promote successful reintegration outcomes while simultaneously reducing crime rates in communities across America.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Correctional facility staff hierarchy:
1. Warden: The highest-ranking staff member in a correctional facility and oversees all aspects of the facility’s operations, including security, personnel management, budgeting and other administrative tasks.
2. Deputy Warden: A deputy warden is responsible for overseeing the daily operation of the prison and managing its staff. They may also oversee inmate programs like education or health care services.
3. Correctional Officers/Guards: These are frontline staff responsible for ensuring the safety of inmates, maintaining order within the institution, enforcing institutional rules and regulations as well as supervising inmates during recreational activities outside their cells or work assignments.

 

 

 

 

 

In 1999, a case is Michigan sentenced Jack Kevorkian, MD, of homicide. He was the essential consideration doctor for Thomas Youk. Youk was a patient of Jack Kevorkian in 1998. Michigan investigators contended that the doctor controlled a deadly portion of an obscure medication after the patient enthusiastically marked a report expressing that is what he believed the doctor should do. After the patient’s passing, Kevorkian was accused of doctor helped self destruction, and first degree murder. Kevorkian’s lawyers contended that the doctor was simply attempting to facilitate the aggravation of the patient. This made the appointed authority decide for the doctor. The doctor helped self destruction charge was dropped. In any case, the first-degree murder accusation remained something similar. The appointed authority condemned the doctor to ten to a quarter century in jail. On June 1, 2007, Jack Kevorkian was delivered released early serving eight years in jail. (Berghmans)

Up until the year 2008, Oregon was the main express that had sanctioned doctor helped self destruction. On November fourth, 2008, Washington state turned into the second state to pass a demise with pride act. The demonstration legitimized doctor helped self destruction.

In 2009, the province of Montana passed a regulation that legitimized doctor helped self destruction. The law made it legitimate for occupants of Montana to doctor helped self destruction. The law expresses that doctor helped self destruction isn’t against public approach. The law shields specialists from arraignment for assisting in critical condition patients with dieing. In any case, the court declined to settle on the off chance that the right is ensured under Montana’s Constitution. (ProCon.org)

On May 20, 2013, Vermont’s lead representative Peter Shumlin endorsed for the “Finish of Life Decisions” bill into regulation. This was significant in light of the fact that this was the first time in Quite a while history that doctor helped self destruction has been made legitimate utilizing the regulative cycle. (ProCon.org)

“On Blemish. 2, 2014, Belgium turned into the world’s most memorable country to lift all age limitations on willful extermination. Lord Philippe of Belgium marked regulation that permits youngsters with terminal and hopeless diseases to decide to be euthanized. The kid should be “close to death, in ‘steady and excruciating physical’ torment with no accessible treatment.” The youngster should likewise have “limit of wisdom and be cognizant right now of the solicitation.” The solicitation must be made recorded as a hard copy, affirmed and settled upon by the treating doctor, affirmed by a second assessment from an external specialist, and afterward the kid should go through mental testing to affirm that the kid comprehends the solicitation completely and that test must be ensured recorded as a hard copy by the therapist. The treating doctor is then expected to meet with the youngster’s folks or legitimate agent to acquire their assent recorded as a hard copy. The Netherlands has comparative regulation however denies killing for youngsters under 12 years old.” (ProCon.org) This is significant in light of the fact that it lifts the age prerequisites of doctor helped self destruction. On the off chance that anybody ought not be ready to end it all, I accept that it ought to be kids.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer