Crime Scene

Description

As a criminalist, you have been asked to speak to a group of students who want to learn more about crime scene investigation.

Write a 1,050- to 2,100-word paper in which you address the following in the same manner as you would address the group of students:
Identify the procedures associated with crime scene evaluation.
Describe the preservation and collection of physical evidence.
Describe the procedures for securing and searching the crime scene to include crime scene safety.
Identify methods of recording the crime scene.

 

 

Sample Solution

Crime Scene

Actions taken at the outset of an investigation at a crime scene can play a pivotal role in the resolution of a case. It is important for the initial responding officer to be observant when approaching, entering, and exiting a crime scene. The procedures associated with crime scene evaluation include: identify scene dimensions – locate the focal point of the scene; establish security – tape around the perimeter; create a plan and communicate – determine the type of crime that occurred; conduct primary survey – identify potential evidence and capture photographs and take notes; document and process scene; conduct secondary survey; and record and preserve evidence. How do you collect and preserve physical evidence? Collect evidence correctly, preserve each specimen separately, use and change gloves often, avoid coughing or sneezing during the collection, use appropriate tools such as cotton-tipped applicators, separate paper bags, and envelopes to prevent cross-contamination of samples.

Thirdly, Vittola argues that war should be avoided (Begby et al (2006b), Page 332) and that we should proceed circumstances diplomatically. This is supported by the “last resort” stance in Frowe, where war should not be permitted unless all measures to seek diplomacy fails (Frowe (2011), Page 62). This means war shouldn’t be declared until one party has no choice but to declare war, in order to protect its territory and rights, the aim of war. However, we can also argue that the war can never be the last resort, given there is always a way to try to avoid it, like sanctions or appeasement, showing Vittola’s theory is flawed. Fourthly, Vittola questions upon whose authority can demand a declaration of war, where he implies any commonwealth can go to war, but more importantly, “the prince” where he has “the natural order” according to Augustine, and all authority is given to him. This is further supported by Aristotle’s Politics ((1996), Page 28): ‘a king is the natural superior of his subjects.’ However, he does later emphasise to put all faith in the prince is wrong and has consequences; a thorough examination of the cause of war is required along with the willingness to negotiate rival party (Begby et al (2006b), Page 312& 318). This is supported by the actions of Hitler are deemed unjustly. Also, in today’s world, wars are no longer fought only by states but also non-state actors like Al-Queda and ISIS, showing Vittola’s normative claim on authority is outdated. This is further supported by Frowe’s claim that the leader needs to represent the people’s interests, under legitimate authority, which links on to the fourth condition: Public declaration of war. Agreed with many, there must be an official announcement on a declaration of war (Frowe (2011), Page 59-60&63). Finally, the most controversial condition is that wars should have a reasonable chance of success. As Vittola reiterated, the aim of war is to establish peace and security; securing the public good. If this can’t be achieved, Frowe argues it would be better to surrender to the enemy. This can be justified because the costs of war would have been bigger (Frowe (2011), Page 56-7).

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.