Criminal justice agencies sometimes rely on private funds

 

Criminal justice agencies sometimes rely on private funds. These funds come from charitable giving, foundations, businesses, private individuals, and community groups. For example, some agencies may accept funds to offset the cost of mounted patrol units that would otherwise be the victim of budget cuts.

For this article review, you are required to locate an article in the CSU Online Library about a city, county, or state agency that accepted private funding. The article you review should be at least two pages in length. Explain the circumstances surrounding this article. Also, be sure to address these questions in your response.

Do you agree or disagree with accepting private funds for the agency and program in the article you chose? Why, or why not?
Describe how environmental factors may play a role in criminal justice agencies needing funding.
Were there any outside factors that played a role in the agency needing and accepting this funding?
Can you think of any other ways that funding could have been secured other than private funds? Did the agency attempt to secure any other sources of funding prior to accepting private funds?
Do you feel the organization donating funds has any influence on policy? Why, or why not?

 

Sample Solution

Funding of criminal justice systems by private entities has gained acceptance in America as the agencies contend with limited budgets. In certain instances, the private sector has extended influence to take over security and policing of public spaces. In many States, private police have taken control of community lands, controlling access points of adjoining lands as well. While private sector support is a welcome move, especially with the resources they inject into policing operations, there are concerns that such a move could precipitate a breakdown in law and order. In particular,  the funders could act in their own interests against the interests of the public. For instance, there are reports of loss prevention officers serving as private police yet their actions are dictated by the whims of their employers rather than curtail rights and freedoms of law breaking individuals.

izzly bears are majestic symbols of the wild. Grizzlies are massive animals with humped shoulders and an elevated forehead that contributes to a somewhat concave profile. Grizzlies once lived in much of western North America and even roamed the Great Plains. Grizzly bears require large amounts of secure habitat, but today’s reality, grizzly bears must routinely navigate roads, subdivisions, livestock operations and energy development. Many Grizzlies that are still roaming in the wild, where hunters pursue them as a big trophies. The greatest threat facing grizzly bear population today are deaths caused by humans.

Human-related deaths and habitat loss remain significant threats to long-term grizzly bear recovery. It is common knowledge that roads have a negative impact on grizzly bear survival. The remaining grizzly bear populations are unconnected, with major towns, roads and railways placed between them. Grizzly bear management is very much an interrelated part of natural resources management whether on a specific or collective basis. Governmental manipulation of natural resources, including the grizzly bear, or “management” actually represents a small proportion of environmental and natural resources administration in the United States. In this sense, management can often be considered a myth, as if it were done by some kind of giant hand of technology under the orchestrated direction of natural resource professionals.

The greatest threat facing grizzly bear population economically, today are deaths caused by humans, In an increasing development world, bears often cross through private lands in search of food and secure habitat. Attractants such as bee yards, garbage, fruit trees, chicken coops, livestock and bird feeders often lure bears close to homes and habituate them, or help them become used to human activity. Nearly 3 million of Yellowstone Park’s annual 4 million visits occur in June, July and August. More than 30,000 people a day visit in the peak summer season   and they all want to see bears. Bear jams keep rangers busy directing traffic and protecting tourists and bears. Seeing a black bear is great, but spotting a grizzly is an even greater, rarer thrill. Tourists who search for bears with binoculars and cameras won’t appreciate having them shot for sport. A grizzly hunting season would hurt the state’s reputation far outside its borders and potentially damage our tourism industry.

Climate change poses new and little understood challenge to the bears. There is evidence suggesting that bears are denning later, and staying on the landscape longer in the fall when unintended shooting by hunters are most common. Most importantly, a changing climate can also impact food resources for grizzlies.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.