Criminal justice social diversity

After reading chapter 3 and 4 of Alexander, M. (2012). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age
of colorblindness. The New Press: New York. and the two attached articles, respond to the discussion:
In chapter 3 Alexander describes a study in which respondents were asked to close their eyes and
envision a drug user then describe that person. The results found that 95% of people described a black person. Now I could ask you to do the same thing and be honest with what you see (although I certainly won’t ask you to share your vision). However, there is a much larger issue here for the criminal justice system. Due to the widespread discretion that we give to police officers (and honestly most every other agent of the CJ system)
personal biases, even if unintentional, such as this can have a profound impact on outcomes. I want you to
carefully consider where this view of drug users comes from, and how it impacts the criminal justice
system.
Police officers, lawyers, correctional staff are all just people so if 95% of the public views drug offenders
as black then it is likely that 95% of these agents do as well. Why? What impact does this (according to
Alexander at least inaccurate) perception have on the CJ system?
In chapter 4 Alexander discusses the collateral consequences that attach to criminal conviction even
without incarceration and almost always without the defendant’s knowledge. I have posted two articles to the supplemental material area that discuss some of these issues. One of the articles discusses the impact of
Paternal incarceration on children, and the other is unique in that it asks people working in the criminal
justice system to consider colllateral consequences. After reviewing this material, do you agree with Alexander?
Her contention is that all of the collateral consequences help ensure a racial caste system. That is while
incarceration is effective at controlling minorities it is really all of the collateral consequences that ensure
once convicted those minorities can never rise up. So is that the reason for the collateral consequences? If not then what is?

Sample Solution

Social work is depicted as workmanship converged with science (Connolly and Harms, 2009, p.4). The science parts of social work are appreciated by the proof based information got from inquires about and practice speculations. The craft of social work happens as social work experts weave together this logical information with individual qualities, proficient aptitudes and encounters. In setting of social work practice, it is adjusted these to the special and specific circumstances. Likewise, social work practice should be applied particular methodologies with various customer bunches in a scope of fields. After perusing the articles about family, family social work ought to be mirrored the reasonable technique, experiences and center abilities. It is incorporated the method for approach, social competency and correspondences abilities in working with family.

It is imperative to address the family-focused methodology which is underpinnings the hypothesis in working with families. It very well may be clarified that family-focused practice includes an attention on working with families/whanau, not solely working with singular individual from families. This methodology is likewise consistent with biological hypothesis. As indicated by Bronfenbrenner (Berger, 2008, p.87), human improvement and family working can be impacted commonly by a layer of ecological angles like society and relationship. Likewise, unique individual is probably going to be interlinked surroundings from the home as a small scale framework to wide society or culture as a macrosystem. Hence, family-focused methodology can be powerful in managing family matters. Family Group Conference is a decent outline of this communitarian family-focused methodology. Discoveries of universal research (Kanyi, 2013, p.39) indicated that expanding on family qualities and working in organization with families to help youngsters turned out a beneficial outcome of kids’ prosperity.

Notwithstanding, the importance of family has assorted relying upon setting and use. In New Zealand setting, legitimate meanings of family connections are changing so as to think about of social and social standards. There are assortment types of family in NZ, for example, true relationship, more distant families of Maori whanau and same sex family. Subsequently, as far as training, it ought to be viewed as the limits of family. Further thought ought to be given to monetarily, topographically, socially and socially minimized families. Social counselor, Choice and Partnership Approach and adaptable area of arrangements started by CAMHS can be urge to better commitment in social work practice (Appleby and Phillips, 2013, 29-30).

All the more significantly, social work experts ought to have social competency. Culture can be characterized as a remarkable part of individual and a lifestyle. Upon the comprehension of natural hypothesis, families could share and be affected by culture as a full scale framework. Appropriately, obviously broad information about various societies can be valuable for understanding the customer’s practices, responses, and choices in social work setting. For instance, the utilization of te reo Maori, karakia and whakapapa when working with Maori family can be framed by indicating gratefulness and regard for their experiences that can add to more profound commitment and affinity (Mooney, 2012, p.51). Not just affinity is fundamental when working with Maori, however down to earth utilization of youth culture additionally can be valuable executes for youth to upgrade commitment.

Another, viable relational abilities are center to great work with kids and families. Unmistakably the nature of connection among professionals and customers is a key determinant of fruitful results in all social work territories. In like manner, to build up close affinity with customers requires explicit method for correspondence relying upon person’s conditions. Specifically, little youngsters’ viewpoints ought to be considered in their procedures in social work setting. As indicated by The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCROC), approved by New Zealand in 1993, furnishes us with a reasonable basic to tune in to youngsters. Article 12 says youngsters reserve ‘the privilege to express those perspectives unreservedly in all issues influencing the kid, the perspectives on the kid being given due weight as per the age and development of the kid’ (UNICEF, 1989, Article 12). Winter (2010, p.186) found that little youngsters are prepared to do express their assessments in their exploration. Along these lines, working with youngsters requires adaptable techniques for correspondence, superb listening aptitudes and innovative methods for including kids simultaneously. Utilizing explicit methods for correspondence, for example, utilizing a creepy crawly gram outline, drawing and pretend can be powerful method for drawing out their perspectives (social work now, 2012, 36-37). In particular, Social specialists need to exhibit a similar elevated levels of compassion for a person’s conditions, regard for their desires and wants and credibility in reacting to them.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.