Cross-cultural communication and negotiation

 

What makes this CEO effective at cross-cultural communication and negotiation?
Discuss how the CEO promotes ethics and social responsibility through their leadership and strategies.
Characterize the organizational culture of the company and how this affects the CEO’s management across cultures.
Using specific examples from at least two different cultures, explain how culture affects the CEO’s decision-making and leadership actions.
Explore the challenges the CEO has faced in global operations.

 

Sample Solution

As cross-cultural business becomes the norm, professionals across industries need to develop and hone a new set of skills to remain competitive: cross-cultural negotiation. Simply put, cross-cultural negotiation empowers you to craft better agreements with customers, suppliers, and coworkers. It also foster better teamwork within your organization, especially when collaborating with colleagues from cultures you might be unfamiliar with. What makes a CEO effective at cross-cultural communication and negotiation? We all arrive at the negotiation table with our own cultural biases and expectations.  It is important to preempt your natural responses to cross-cultural situations, so you can keep unfavorable behavior in check.

style expected for the circumstance is very valuable in figuring out the basics of administration (Pettinger, 2007). Chelladurai in his Multi Dimensional Model of Leadership, develops a lot of Fiedler’s hypothesis however in a continuum based approach, in which the pioneer can adjust their administration style to fit the circumstance (Chelladurai and Madella, 2006). Chelladurai’s hypothesis is taken from sports brain science however can be applied to a hierarchical situation. It gives a substantially more observational categorisation of errand structure, obviously separating a plenty of circumstances that require specific initiative styles for progress. Chealldurai found three qualities that influence the initiative style expected for a circumstance, called predecessors, they primarily develop Fiedler’s situational variables and pioneer – part relations and at last influence how a pioneer ought to act towards a circumstance. The first are situational attributes, the climate in which the pioneer should play out, the second are pioneer attributes, the experience, individual characteristics and abilities of the pioneer, and the third are part qualities, the inspiration, expertise and experience levels of gathering individuals (Chelladurai and Madella, 2006). The situational qualities and part attributes have a necessary way of behaving to guarantee most extreme gathering execution, they likewise have a favored way of behaving to guarantee the fulfillment of gathering individuals, on the off chance that the pioneers genuine way of behaving matches both the expected way of behaving and favored conduct of the circumstance the result is greatest gathering execution and fulfillment. Be that as it may, on the off chance that the gathering are not performing and accomplishing objectives or are not fulfilled or both, then the pioneer can correct their real way of behaving to work on this. Pioneers ready to screen execution and fulfillment, and comprehend what is expected to change going on will accomplish ideal gathering execution in Chelladurai’s model. The one restriction of Chealldurai’s model is that it expects the pioneer is in a place of complete positional control over the gathering, and can execute any initiative style fitting their personal preference without imperatives. Positional power is the power and impact a pioneer has over a gathering, in the event that the pioneer has positional power, they will actually want to execute the authority style they best see fit for the circumstance. Position

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.