Cruciformity
After reading the book Cruciformity, post an initial thread to include the following (use separate bolded section titles or paragraphs to break up the post showing where each point is addressed):
Approximately, what percentage of the book was read in preparation for this discussion?
What do you believe the main premise of the book was? On what basis did you make this conclusion (provide support from the book and explain)? Do you believe the author convincingly made his point?
Do you believe this book emphasizes the crucifixion too much to the extent that it neglects the resurrection? Why or why not?
Find one other definitive statement given in the book with which you strongly agreed or disagreed. Explain and defend from Scripture your strong response in light of that statement.
Sample Solution
The basic premise of the book is pretty easy to grasp: The Christian life is best lived as a life of self-denying love for others following Jesus’ example of giving Himself on the cross. Most studies of Paul concentrate solely on his theology. This book breaks new ground by focusing on the source and nature of Paul’s spirituality. Taking his cue from Paul’s express desire to “know nothing but Christ crucified,” Michael Gorman shows how Paul’s personal experience of God constantly intersects with the story of the cross, an event that both reveals the cruciform character of God and shapes believers into a community of “cruciformity” (conformity to the crucified Christ). Expertly combining biblical studies and theological reflection, this noteworthy volume presents a model of the Christian life marked by faith, love, power, and hope.
