Choose an issue from the options provided, related to the intersection of international law, policy, politics, and diplomacy.
Choose from the following options:
• Korean War (1950-1953)
• Cuban missile crisis
• Vietnam War
• Iran hostage crisis (1979-1981)
• Gulf War (1991)
Identify a major international crisis related to that issue, provide factual background, collect data describing the process used to resolve the crisis, explain whether the plan used was the best course of action, and explain the outcome.
Analyze the chosen crisis/event from the perspective of US foreign policy.
Compare the effectiveness of the plan considering all the international issues, identify the specific strengths and weaknesses of the approach, and note how diplomacy was used to address the crisis.
During the Cuban Missile Crisis, leaders of the U.S. and the Soviet Union engaged in a tense, 13-day political and military standoff in October 1962 over the installation of nuclear-armed Soviet missiles on Cuba, just 90 miles from U.S. shores. From the outset of the crisis, Kennedy and ExComm determined that the presence of Soviet missiles in Cuba was unacceptable. Perhaps the biggest consequence of the Cuban Missile Crisis was the political isolation that the country faced in the years and decades that followed. After the event`s conclusion, Cuban relations with the Soviet Union reached an all-time low with the Khrushchev regime.
and the honest of human consideration and the way to fruitful mankind. In XV.8 of the Analects, Confucius expresses, “The decided researcher and the man of righteousness won’t try to inhabit the cost of humankind. They will try and forfeit their lives to protect their humankind. “Confucius contends that the existence of an indiviudal is to safeguard one’s ethicalness. The demonstrations of that individual should be safeguarded to act to the upside. Another platitude that validate Confucius contention is IV.25 (Eastern), it states, “Ideals isn’t passed on to remain solitary. He who rehearses it will have neighbors.” However, in the western philosophical view, Aristotle contends that the perspective on highminded action uncovers how the individual adds to an extraordinary life. Activities are significant when one live calmly with another. For instance, nationalism comes into mind with regards to America. Throughout the long term, fighters have been associated with their gallantry. Consequently, the officers are battling for what they accept to be their honor, yet they are endangering their life.
Confucius keeps on looking for information. He is by all accounts exceptionally unimportant, intertwined, and little leaning. Moreover, he can be common, contemplative and altruistic. This can be reliable with Plato’s perspectives. Most social orders and culture makes progress toward goodness, and pioneers have their essential shared traits for individual way of behaving, which should be visible in VI. 28. This expressing thinks about to Socrates. Confucius, as well, needs to spread the insight to everybody. He maintains that everybody should be well, not simply himself.
Finally, one more noticeable figure in the realm of reasoning is Plato. Plato’s compositions, for example, Apology show sensational records of the occasions prompting his demise, as well as delineating matters of worries, moral living, and consistent focus and articulation.
“Expression of remorse” signifies “legitimate safeguard of preliminary.” Plato offers to examine about the guard of reasoning as a lifestyle. A spirit is important for a day to day existence, though, the spirit decides the things we practice on a regular basis. Phaedo delineates significant contentions for individual everlasting status. In Phaedo, Plato contended that the spirit is “something”, as opposed to a feeling of “concordance.” Unlike congruity, the spirit exists, which is more dynamic than others. Spirits are more idealistic, which agreement doesn’t relate to. Soul pre-exists which congruity doesn’t. Then again, on the off chance that spirit is in a gathering of concordance, all spirits would be as well, which is unimaginable. Consequently, soul is a kind of material, which is tremendously upgraded than congruity. One more contention that Plato makes should be visible in the “Republic.” He contended that the spirit is separated in three sections, and each part is a sort of want. Individually, these cravings are levelheaded, appetitive, or lively. To be upright one should comprehend what is the gainful. The person should have the vivacious cravings to be instructed appropriately, which will ultimately prompt the insurance from the spirit. Plato shows the training of the spirit in Books II and III. Critically, a prudent individual figures out how to live by a superior climate when he is youthful, and continues on to make temperate ways of behaving. His activities are created while he is developing and realizes the reason why what he is doing is great. Whenever he has taken in the upside, then he would comprehend the reason why his activities were temperate. Glancing back at Plato’s contentions, he contends that ethicalness just shows one to act in various ways.