Cultural Analysis

 

Scenario You work for Quantigration, Inc., a semiconductor manufacturing plant headquartered in the United States. Quantigration’s main fabrication plant produces microchips used in mobile phones and laptops around the world. Capitalizing on advancements in its product, Quantigration has aggressively expanded and recently acquired two fabrication plants and workers from around the world. Due to these acquisitions and partnerships, Quantigration must develop a plan to assist employees of different nationalities in understanding each other and working well together. Yesterday, the plant supervisor, Gregory, called you into his office. He has some concerns about these cultural differences and is worried that the acquisitions might not go smoothly. The culture of a manufacturing plant in one country could be noticeably different from one in another part of the world. Gregory realizes that these differences could lead to conflict. To handle this issue, he has decided that Quantigration needs to update its company values to be more culturally inclusive. ——————————————– Directions Gregory would like you to begin by doing background research and analysis. He would like you to take stock of the current culture at Quantigration and then compare it to the national cultures of the two new acquisitions. Part 1: Cultural Analysis First, examine your own national culture as a representative sample of the current Quantigration workforce. Think about how your own nationality relates to your culture. Consider the ways that your culture views interactions with others, workplace culture, teamwork, and communication. Then, select two countries different than your own. You may select two countries from the Understanding Global Cultures e-book, or, you may choose others that you have a particular interest in. You can find more information about some of the countries in the A to Z World Business resource and the Hofstede Insights Country Comparison Tool in the Supporting Materials section. Using what you have found, write a cultural analysis containing 250- to 500-word summaries of each of your selected cultures. Also include a summary of your own culture in this document. In these summaries, pay particular attention to how members of each culture interact with others, what values they consider important, and how they view work, family, and obligation. Once you have completed your summaries of your selected countries, write a 500-word summary comparison to help Gregory understand the major difference and similarities between the cultures. In your comparison, identify three major cultural differences and three similarities between the cultures you’ve analyzed. As you write, consider common cultural dim​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​ensions that these cultures share, and the ways that they differ most. Part 2: Cultural Value Reaction Now that you have finished your analyses, Gregory would like you to examine Quantigration’s company values. (Read the article “How to Write a Company Value Statement That Will Achieve Strategic Impact” in the Supporting Materials section for more information on how company value statements can motivate employees and reflect company objectives.) Review the three company values Gregory has given you: Family: Everyone who works here is part of the Quantigration family. Process: Following processes will result in quality products. Numbers: Precision engineering requires precision thinking. Consider each company value from the viewpoint of each selected culture from your cultural analysis. Think about how these values relate to the cultural values you have uncovered in each of the countries you analyzed. Then, write a brief reaction for Gregory that examines the values. For each company value, write a 200-word summary explaining whether it does or does not represent the values of the three cultures you have examined, providing specific reasons why or why not. In particular, ask yourself the following: Which company values align closely with the values of the cultures? Are there any values that seem directly opposed to any of your selected cultures? Would any of the company’s values cause tension for an employee coming from one of your selected countries? You should also include recommended changes to the values to better align them to your own culture and the cultures you have selected to examine, and to encourage better intercultural interaction. ————————————————— What to Submit Every project has a deliverable or deliverables, which are the files that must be submitted before your project can be assessed. For this project, you must submit the following: Cultural Analysis Using information from the e-book Understanding Global Cultures, write a cultural analysis of two cultures. This document should include: One 250- to 500-word summary of your own culture (white American Male) Two 250- to 500-word summaries of countries chosen from Understanding Global Cultures A 500-word comparison of the similarities and differences between the cultures Company Value Reaction Write an email to Gregory with three 200-word reflections about how the company’s three value statements align with your chosen cultures. ———————— Supporting Material: Hofstede Insights: Compare Countries https://www.hofstede-insights.com/product/compare-countries/ Use this tool to learn more about the countries you will compare in your project. https://www.atozworldbusiness.com/ This is a comprehensive country-by-country resource for success in international business and trade

 

Sample Solution

funding was recently extended for five years.16 In this waiver were authorizations to increase copayments for inappropriate emergency department use or high-cost drug utilization, to increase premiums, to terminate coverage for failure to pay premiums after a three-month period, and to eliminate retroactive coverage for new enrollees. 16 Stakeholders include Medicaid beneficiaries, the state of New Mexico, and Medicaid beneficiaries with opioid or other substance abuse disorders. Medicaid beneficiaries without a substance abuse disorder will lose substantial coverage if unable to consistently pay premiums and spend higher percentages of their total income on copayments if unable to meet new requirements; these stakeholders will only benefit from health coverage if they are able to meet the new requirements. Medicaid beneficiaries with opioid addiction or other substance abuse disorders will be harmed in the same way, but will receive an additional benefit for coverage of treatment of their substance abuse disorder. The state of New Mexico will benefit if beneficiaries are unable to meet the new requirements by controlling costs if coverage is terminated, if premiums and copayments are raised, and if beneficiaries are able to meet the requirements by choosing less costly drugs and by appropriately using emergency departments. In addition, the state of New Mexico will also benefit from a healthier population by treating opioid-dependent beneficiaries in their state. Overall, this waiver favors the state of New Mexico and may have some negative implications for Medicaid beneficiaries if they are unaware of or unable to meet new requirements.
Although these demonstration waivers are designed to address very different issues affecting the Medicaid population and can be difficult to compare, I would not recommend either waiver for either issue because their implementation has a vast number of negative impacts on the populations it is designed to help. While states must include requirements to ensure sustainability of Medicaid funding, many of these requirements unfairly disadvantage an already disadvantaged population and do not seem appropriate. Ultimately, these waivers demonstrate a value system that I do not agree with nor support, and I could not recommend either waiver based on the downstream impacts it has on its beneficiaries.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer