Cultural Considerations In Mental Health Nursing

 

Submit an evidence-based practice paper about cultural competency in mental health nursing. An evidence-based practice paper allows you to explore best practice and help improve client outcomes on a psychiatric unit. Your paper should describe how you, as a nurse, will include – or have included – cultural awareness in a client diagnosed with a mental illness. The person you describe could be someone in your clinical setting, someone you have worked with in the past, or a theoretical client.

Remember that culture can also include gender equality, sexual orientation, and other cultures besides race and religion – including cultures unique to one particular family. Your paper should be at least 3 pages (double-spaced, not including the title or reference pages) in APA Format and include:

Assessment: Discuss what you would assess in regard to a client’s culture. For example, are there specific dietary requirements? Are schedule changes necessary to avoid conflicts with religious practices? Who is the spokesperson for the family? What would you assess?
Diagnosis: List any mental health nursing diagnoses this person has or may be at risk for. Include at least one cultural diagnosis.
Planning: What planning needs to be done to ensure the cultural and emotional safety of the client?
Implementation: What are interventions that would ensure the safety of your client in regard to culture? Include at least two interventions. For example, if your client has religious beliefs that affect the ability to take medications, what interventions would you create to ensure the client’s safety? What can you do to make sure the client’s cultural needs are met?
Evaluation: How will you evaluate whether your implementation was effective? Make sure the parameters are objective and measurable.
In your summary, discuss whether any completed interventions were successful. What could be done differently in the future? If the interventions have not yet been carried out, you might discuss some institutional changes that could be made to ensure cultural safety for all clients in that setting.

 

 

Sample Solution

drawing a distinction between speech and action, as it states “a statute which fails to draw this distinction impermissibly intrudes upon the freedoms guaranteed by the First and Fourteenth Amendments” (Wertheimer, 1994). Specifically, hate speech and the promotion of genocide are permitted based on the US constitutional belief that “speech does not incite violence” (Wertheimer, 1994). However, this system has not been effective in regards to preventing violence and hatred towards minorities. This is relevant in relation to political figures such as Trump, as he uses his privilege of free speech to demonize immigrants and minorities (Peterson, 2018). Trump’s ideologies began to motivate white supremacists, particularly American Nazi sympathizers, who have similarly voiced their hateful opinions of minorities and have proceeded vandalize areas, such as Charlottesville, with anti-semitism remarks and violent rallies (Peterson, 2018). In this way, the US maintains the risk of perpetuating genocide by remaining lenient in regards to limiting freedom of speech. Moreover, it is evident that acts such as these have psychologically harmed minorities to the point where physical damage is evident. Particularly, the psychological effects of hate speech have proven to enhance anxiety, fear, rapid breathing, PTSD, depression, psychosis, panic attacks and suicide (Levine, 2018). In this way, limitations on free speech do not extend to “racial equality, order, and the avoidance of deliberately induced trauma” (Levine, 2018). For example, the US has strict regulations regarding free speech and its involvement with copyright but fails to extend these regulations for the purposes of protecting minorities (Levine, 2018). Essentially, it appears that the US legal system values liberty over equality, whereas Germany’s system serves to prevent the perpetuation of racism and genocide using strict provisions against the advocacy for genocide; this appears to be significantly more effective in reducing anti-semitism, as the US remains in a perpetuated cycle of racism and violence.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.