Culturally Diverse World Presentation

 

 

 

 

One purpose of social studies instruction, in a democratic and inclusive society, is to connect our society with a common mindset – one society working together for the betterment of all people. Instruction must allow students to see current themes in society and how they relate to themselves and others. When students are exposed to culturally relevant content and a democratic worldview, along with a chance to collaborate and interact with cross-curricular content with the arts, the effectiveness of social studies instruction is maximized.

Your professional learning community (PLC) has determined they want to build foundational knowledge on promoting students’ abilities to make informed decisions as citizens of a culturally diverse democratic society and interdependent world. Choose grade level standards, one social studies and one arts standard. Create a 12-15 slide digital presentation for your colleagues to help them become more informed on culturally relevant social studies instruction in the inclusive classroom.

Include the following elements:

Explanation of culturally relevant instruction including current, grade level societal themes for social studies instruction.
Challenges and benefits of culturally relevant instruction at the chosen grade level.
At least one learning objective that includes cross-curricular concepts of the chosen social studies and arts standards.
Three strategies that can be used to teach the chosen standards and how those strategies incorporate student collaboration, cultural relevance, and a democratic worldview.
Explain how each strategy can be adapted for students in an inclusive classroom in a way that demonstrates compassion and care for the individual student.
Title slide, reference slide, and presenter’s notes.

Sample Solution

In addition, Vittola expresses the extent of military tactics used, but never reaches a conclusion whether it’s lawful or not to proceed these actions, as he constantly found a middle ground, where it can be lawful to do such things but never always (Begby et al (2006b), Page 326-31). This is supported by Frowe, who measures the legitimate tactics according to proportionality and military necessity. It depends on the magnitude of how much damage done to one another, in order to judge the actions after a war. For example, one cannot simply nuke the terrorist groups throughout the middle-east, because it is not only proportional, it will damage the whole population, an unintended consequence. More importantly, the soldiers must have the right intention in what they are going to achieve, sacrificing the costs to their actions. For example: if soldiers want to execute all prisoners of war, they must do it for the right intention and for a just cause, proportional to the harm done to them. This is supported by Vittola: ‘not always lawful to execute all combatants…we must take account… scale of the injury inflicted by the enemy.’ This is further supported by Frowe approach, which is a lot more moral than Vittola’s view but implies the same agendas: ‘can’t be punished simply for fighting.’ This means one cannot simply punish another because they have been a combatant. They must be treated as humanely as possible. However, the situation is escalated if killing them can lead to peace and security, within the interests of all parties.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.