Cyber Crime Task Force Plan

at
Categories
Tags

 

 

Develop a cyber crime task force plan for St. Louis County in Missouri. Use research from the Internet to identify cyber crime investigative strategies and task force developments around the country. Identify techniques, tools, and organizational structures used by other law enforcement agencies to determine which ones will be most useful for your task force. Use the following outline to produce your plan for the St. Louis police commissioner:
1.Executive Summary of Cyber Crime Task Force Plan (one paragraph)
2.Cyber crime threats in St. Louis County
What are the greatest cyber crime threats that St. Louis County is currently facing or likely to face in the near future? (Use data and statistics from outside the course text.)
Which three types of cyber crime will be the top priorities for the task force?
3.Cyber Crime Task Force Structure
Which organizational structure will the task force utilize?
What personnel and skills will the task force need to investigate the top three cyber threats?
Which federal agencies in the St. Louis area should the task force develop relationships with in order to be effective?
4.Cyber Crime Task Force Equipment
Which types of equipment, technologies, and items should the police commissioner acquire for the Cyber Crime Task Force?
What is needed to develop a cyber crime lab capable of performing cyber forensics?
Why are these systems important?
5.Cyber Crime Legislation
In order to pursue cyber criminals, what legislation and provisions should be developed in St. Louis County to increase local law enforcement capacity for investigating cyber crime?
Where should these laws be passed?
6Conclusion
In addition to those identified above, what other factors should be considered in building a Cyber Crime Task Force?

 

Sample Solution

he opening line’s ambiguity stems from its syntax and grammar, without even delving into the possible semantics. ‘Much suspected’ subverts the auxiliary verb ‘is’ (of the conjunction ‘to be’). The employment of the preposition ‘by’ is most interesting as it allows for two, rather significant, interpretations. Undeniably, the preposition ‘by’ refers to ‘the doer of the action’, and in the Elizabethan era it also had the meaning of ‘referring’ (OED). So, ‘much [is] suspected by me’ can refer to Elizabeth herself being suspicious of others. This is a subtle jab at the prejudices and injustices filed against her. This interpretation is hidden behind the guise of the alternative reading. Elizabeth is being held under suspicion herself, much is suspected ‘of’ her. Crucially though, Elizabeth is saying that despite the fact that her name is admittedly under fire, she is not guilty because the claim has no substance. The past tense of the verb ‘suspected’ could also imply that ever since her birth Elizabeth has been guilty of something; namely, preventing one of her male counterparts to the throne. Moreover, by placing the pronoun (very personally in the objective form of I, ‘me’) at the end of the line reverses the blame to those who ‘suspect’ Elizabeth. It confuses the typical ‘subject-verb-object’ order and cleverly fuses who the oppressor of blame is.

The cohesion between the two lines establish that though there is an act of resistance against false claims, Elizabeth is placed in a submissive position. She must act, and write, with a docile quality, relying upon implicit interpretation alone, as ‘Nothing proved can be’. The stark contrast between the verb

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.
Hi, how can I help?