Cybersecurity policy

at
Categories
Tags

 

Write a paper focused on the social implications of the cybersecurity policy. What are the social implications that arise from the cybersecurity policy/strategy you have selected? This should be a two-page paper describing the connections between society and the cybersecurity policy/strategy you have selected. Attention should be given to the social factors that led to the development of the policy/strategy, the social consequences of the policy/strategy, and the way that cultural and subcultural influences have shaped the policy. The paper must include at least three scholarly journal articles to support the discussion.

Sample Solution

The social implications that arise from the cybersecurity policy/strategy selected depend on how it is implemented and enforced. For instance, if the policy places a heavy emphasis on surveillance and data collection of users’ activities, this could lead to potential privacy concerns as well as a feeling of distrust among users who may feel like their movements are being monitored (Cavusoglu et al., 2020). Additionally, policies related to encryption can have unintended effects in terms of making certain types of communications or transactions more difficult for people with limited resources (McNamara & Murchu, 2018). Furthermore, any restrictions placed on data sharing or access might also create issues for people who rely heavily on such services. Therefore, it is important to consider all possible social impacts when crafting an effective cybersecurity policy/strategy.

This leads to question of what qualifies to be a combatant, and whether it is lawful to kill each other as combatants. Combatants are people who are involved directly or indirectly with the war and it is lawful to kill ‘to shelter the innocent from harm…punish evildoers (Begby et al (2006b), Page 290).However, as mentioned above civilian cannot be harmed, showing combatants as the only legitimate targets, another condition of jus in bello, as ‘we may not use the sword against those who have not harmed us (Begby et al (2006b), Page 314).’ In addition, Frowe suggested combatants must be identified as combatants, to avoid the presence of guerrilla warfare which can end up in a higher death count, for example, the Vietnam War. Moreover, he argued they must be part of the army, bear arms and apply to the rules of jus in bello. (Frowe (2011), Page 101-3). This suggests Frowe seeks a fair, just war between two participants avoiding non-combatant deaths, but wouldn’t this lead to higher death rate for combatants, as both sides have relatively equal chance to win since both use similar tactics? Nevertheless, arguably Frowe will argue that combatant can lawfully kill each other, showing this is just, which is also supported by Vittola, who states: ‘it is lawful to draw the sword and use it against malefactors (Begby et al (2006b), Page 309).’

This question has been answered.

Get Answer