Data mining

 

 

1.Define data mining and why it is important to business organizations.
2.Data mining is at the intersection of many disciplines. Please list 7 of those disciplines.
3.Describe structured and unstructured data. Please give examples of each.
4.A major objective in data mining is to extract patterns from data. Explain what a data pattern is, and list 4 types of patterns related to data mining.
5.Discuss at least 3 industries where data mining is used and how data mining can help companies in those industries.
6.Explain the 6 steps in the CRISP Data Mining Process.
7.Describe the 4 ways data should be prepared before being used for data mining.
8.Discuss the SEMMA Data Mining Process.
9.Describe the Classification data mining method.What are some of the methodologies and techniques used for the Classification method?
10.Discuss Cluster Analysis in terms of how it’s results may be used, and some of the analysis methods used.
11.Describe Association Rule Mining. How can it be used in business?
12.What is meant by Supervised and Unsupervised learning methods?

 

 

Sample Solution

Data mining

After experiencing a slow sales month or watching a poor-performing marketing campaign, how do you pinpoint what went wrong? Tracking and reviewing data from business processes helps you uncover performance breakdowns so you can better understand each part of the process and know which steps need to be fixed and which are performing well. That is data mining. Simply put, data mining is the process that companies use to turn raw data into useful information. It pulls out information from data sets and compares it to help the business make decisions. Structured data refers to data that resides in a fixed field within a file or record. It is typically stored in a relational database (RDBMS). It can consist of numbers and text. Unstructured data is more or less all the data that is not structured. Typical examples are rich media, text, social media activity, surveillance imagery, and so on.

 

 

 

 

 

We Do Not Understand Anything

At the littlest sizes of presence, our originations of existence are unessential. State on the off chance that we experienced littler and littler sizes of our bodies, we would find that in the long run we would show up at Planck length (Roper, 131). To envision the size of Planck length, think about that as a hydrogen iota is 10 trillion Planck lengths over. At this scale, reality as we probably am aware it can never again can be comprehended.

So I don’t get that’s meaning as far as getting ourselves? Indeed, we can properly say that truly, we do have reality concurring certain sizes of ourselves (bigger than Planck length), yet with respect to our ultra-microscopic selves, the basic matter of what our identity is, our understanding of presence separates (Joplin, 12).

Who might we be without existence? A few people may state we would be nothing, while others may state we would resemble virtual particles, flying all through presence—which is somewhat more than nothing, however it can’t be said to carefully exist. It would mean we exist and don’t exist at the same time. This thought compares to my next point: that any inquiry we pose can be replied from various perspectives.

The response to any question is vague when attempting to state demanding truth (Hopp, 45). Take a straightforward inquiry for a model: “What is your name?” My name is Nicholas David Klacsanzky as indicated by law, however my name could be any number of names that I have appended to my character, and others have given me. Is my legitimate name my actual and just name? That is up for translation. What’s more, indeed, any announcement of assumed “truth” can be disentangled to show that there is another approach to take a gander at it.

There is a Zen maxim that comes this way, “To talk is to commit an error.” This is said with the possibility that reality can’t be spoken, as truth is comprehensive and even past being—it would need to be spoken about in wording that don’t exist in language all together for the truth of reality to be seen through language (which is a mystery).

In this way, truth is an encounter. I accept this is the reason Socrates stated, “I know just of my own obliviousness,” and made the individuals at the highest point of antiquated Greek society confounded about their essential ideas of their reality. We can’t comprehend reality through mental ideas: just through our unadulterated experience without the hindrance of mental movement.

Without the interference and obfuscating of reality by mental procedures, presence is clear. We don’t have to comprehend anything so as to know presence for what it’s worth. Truth be told, the main way we can see the truth is by quitting any pretense of attempting to comprehend and quitting any pretense of “getting” itself. At that point we can observer life in the entirety of its significant effortlessness.

References

Roper, Jake. Troubling Truth. New York: Owl Books, 2008. Print.

Joplin, Michele. Transformative Coexistence. Chicago: Bob Fugen Press, 2012. Print.

Hopp, Jason. Untruthful Truths. Seattle: Reed Bender Press, 2013. Print.

paper about nature, science article, innovation exposition

5/5

NEED HELP?

Approach a specialist for FREE

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.