“Death of a Moth”

Watch a video on Comparing “Death of a Moth” by Annie Dillard to “The Death of the Moth” by Virginia Woolf in a Student-Led Discussion and do the following:
1. Describe one example of a teacher applying Bloom’s Taxonomy.
2. Explain why the example in C1 is an application of Bloom’s Taxonomy.

 

 

 

Sample Solution

Bloom’s Taxonomy is an educational framework for categorizing learning objectives based on complexity and depth of knowledge (Higgins et al., 2018). It is often used by teachers to plan and assess student learning. In the student-led discussion about “Death of a Moth” by Annie Dillard and “The Death of the Moth” by Virginia Woolf, one example of a teacher employing Bloom’s Taxonomy can be seen when they ask students to compare and contrast the two stories using higher order thinking skills.

This activity requires students to draw upon previously acquired knowledge in order to come up with meaningful connections between both pieces while also needing them to analyze, evaluate and create new ideas (Krathwohl et al., 2000). Students must first recall facts from each story such as which characters are present , what themes are present etc before engaging in more complex processes like synthesizing or evaluating these elements across both texts (Krathwohl et al., 2000).

Thus, this task demonstrates how Bloom’s taxonomy can be applied within a classroom setting as it encourages students to think critically about material beyond just reciting facts or providing surface level responses . Additionally, it allows teachers to observe their students’ understanding of material at different levels rather than simply relying on memorization which provides valuable insight into their progress .

In conclusion, this example illustrates how Bloom\’s Taxonomy can be effectively employed in any classroom setting. By forcing students to work through various levels of thought it promotes deeper understanding and encourages creative problem solving.

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.