Debate on where CAM provides safety approaches in promoting health.

 

Recently, there has been debate on where CAM provides safety approaches in promoting health. Some of these approaches have undergone vigorous evaluation and have been found to be safe and even effective in managing patients with chronic illness such as cancer, diabetes, and HTN. Some of the approaches of CAM include yoga, meditation, acupuncture, massage, and many others. These approaches are used to treat and even manage symptoms of chronic illness, for example cancer. In most cases, cancer patients tend to prefer using CAM approaches because it helps in managing pain and when used alongside standard or traditional medicine, it lessen the side effects of the treatment (Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) 2019). For example, chemotherapy has been known to have severe side effects such as nausea and vomiting and even having difficulty sleeping. These alternative approaches help in reducing the side effects and giving the patient ways to cope during the treatment. CAM therapies include vast arrays of botanical and nutritional products, which most of these have been approved by FDA. Another reason why patients tend to opt for CAM is because most of these supplements do not require prescription to purchase them. This means that it is the decision of the individual or the patient to decide what is best for them.

There have also been growing debate between holistic approach and allopathic care. Both of these are considered to promote healthcare. Holistic approach refers ways to provide support that focuses on the whole individual rather than not just their mental health needs. This means that the support also focuses on the physical and emotional needs of the person as well as social and spiritual wellbeing of the person. These aspects are considered important in the wellbeing of the individual. The aspects in holistic care aim at preventing disease rather than treating the symptoms (Evangelatos & Eliadi, 2019). On the other hand refers to science based or evidence based model. This is focused on more conventional and it is evidence based where it uses doctors and other professional healthcare providers such as nurses to treat symptoms using conventional approaches in medicine. All of these approaches, that is, allopathic and holistic care aim in promoting healthcare. The difference is that, unlike CAM or holistic care, allopathic medicine tends to depend on clinical studies and screening to establish diagnosis by focusing on a person’s symptoms and signs before instilling treatment (Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) 2019). In my opinion, both of these approaches promote healthcare and because of this, I don’t have any conflict if the patient decide to use either of them.

 

Sample Solution

reply to the Teacher. Specialists like Ely (1984) and Samimy (1991) contemplated Risk taking and considered Risk Taking as one of the attributes of good students. Swain (1985) states that active participation of the students in arrangement of importance through information gives students significant output. Important input is basic in framing semantic skill and significant output is vital in shaping syntactic skill. Thus, Student quietness in classroom is the issue of EFL Teachers.

In any case, scientists don’t all concur that absence of Risk Taking capacity isn’t exclusively external. Analysts included not just non-Student related components or outside elements yet additionally Student related or inner variables.

Student related variables comprise of individual and full of feeling factors identified with students Risk Taking performance. They incorporate age, gender, identity, motivation, confidence and anxiety. Students’ Risk taking conduct is affected by outer factors, for example, their social convictions or practices, their learning circumstance, for example,

Teachers’ attitude, teaching style and other course related components like class size and classroom exercises. Ely (1989), in a classroom perception and sound chronicle the members trying to discover the connection between Risk Taking and oral support, reasoned that there was a critical connection between classroom participation and oral capability.

Risk Taking elements can be sorted as Student related variables those that influence students from inside and non-Student related elements those that influence students from outside and exist in Language learning condition. Student related variables or interior components are those that the individual Language student carries with him/her to the specific learning circumstances include: inspiration, confidence, anxiety, and personality trait. External elements are those that portray the specific Language-learning circumstance. Non Student related elements affecting risk taking conduct of the Language students incorporate their learning circumstance, for example, Teacher’s attitude and teaching styles and course related elements like class size and classroom action.

Community Language learning or advising getting the hang of as indicated by Curran (1976), proposes an agreeable and warm atmosphere in which students are urged to practice activities t

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.