Defense mechanisms

 

Defense mechanisms Which of the following is an example of a mature defense mechanism? A. Projection B. Repression C. Altruism D. Regression The correct answer for the above question is C. Altruism What is the rationale for option C being the correct answer? Why is option A, B and D incorrect? Explai​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​n

 

Sample Solution

The mature defenses are defined by a healthy and conscious relationship with reality. Reality is accepted even when it is not appreciated. Uncomfortable feelings and thoughts are deliberately transformed into less threatening forms rather than being pushed aside. People decide and choose to cope using mature defense mechanism. Altruism may be used as a defense mechanism, for example, by being particularly helpful to a person who we feel might dislike us or neutralizing an argument with kind words and positivity. In principle, as a mature defense mechanism, the defensive altruism should make people do truly virtuous things that truly benefit others and society (Vaillant, 1977).

this paper, I will frame John Searle’s Chinese room psychological test. Further, I will address the three significant protests raised to his contention named the Systems Reply, Robot Reply, and Brain Simulator Reply. Subsequent to tending to and cautiously examining these, I will talk about Searle’s answers to these complaints and state whether I view his protests as agreeable. To complete my paper, I will offer my own perspectives on why I don’t view the Chinese room as a convincing motivation to surrender the possibility that comprehension is best perceived as a sort of calculation.

In his paper “Psyches, Brains and Programs,” Searle talks about the two limits of man-made: areas of strength for brainpower and powerless AI, and decides to focus on the previous guaranteeing that PCs would be able or ultimately will have mental capacities. Searle summons the Chinese room psychological test to move the meaning areas of strength for of to eventually infer that cerebrums cause brains and linguistic structure isn’t identical to semantics. He requests that perusers envision an English-talking individual unequipped with Chinese proficiency being secured in a room. Here there are three bunches of Chinese composition, content and images with English guidelines, separately, and a bunch of decides in English that connect the initial two clusters to create the third. In the event that a Chinese speaker passes notes with Chinese characters under the entryway for the English-speaker to answer, they will actually want to answer with the assets gave in the room. These reactions are unclear from that of a local Chinese speaker. This situation is similar to how a PC carries out its customized roles. With the utilization of this trial, Searle expected to demonstrate that albeit a PC might have the option to have the option to emulate a human all around ok to finish the Turing Assessment, this doesn’t mean the PC is clever. Searle excuses this case under the grounds that this individual is simply adhering to directions and not grasping the language.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.