Description of Art Experience and Activity Set-up

Describe:
who you observed (your child, your niece, your neighbor etc.)
their age and name.
If you observed children in a classroom, give the age range and the number of students who participated during the experience.
Description of Art Experience and Activity Set-up
Date and Time of Implementation.
Include the starting and ending time for the Art Experience.
Location (Home, Early Childhood Center, Indoors, Outdoors)
Planning:

Write a detailed paragraph addressing the following questions:

Describe your decision-making process in selecting the materials and provocation elements (why did you chose these materials). Using what we have been learning about creating a welcoming and inviting learning experience in lab and lecture what were the decisions behind your set-up?
Address how the materials were selected in relationship to each other. How do you see the material properties working together? Their relationships should be intentional and should not be because you “had a lot of these materials” or that “they all were art materials”.
Note: You will be graded based on your planning, preparation, and organization of this implementation. Include a description of your decision-making process in selecting the set-up location and time. Your Art Experience materials, provocation materials, and when and where you implement should be intentional.

Documentation:

Embed two (2) photos: (1) CLOSE UP photo of your ART ACTIVITY SET-UP AND one (1) at a distance to show the full set up. Taken prior to implementation of the experience.
Embed a minimum of three (3) and no more than four (4 )photos of the child(ren) engaged in the art activity.
Your documentation of children should not be staged. Do not include photos of them looking at the camera
Select photos of them engaged in their work.
Write a brief description of what the child was doing next to each photo.
Sizing: A single photo should be resized to a quarter of a page or less; photos should remain large enough to clearly see the image.

Images should be inserted into your typed document in line with your writing.

Do not attach images separately or at the end of the paper

Include any photos of modifications you may have made. Images should be inserted into your typed document . (Do not attach separately).

Anecdote:

Write one detailed objective anecdote using the anecdote format.
Select a moment when the child you are observing (the one you chose for your anecdote) demonstrated problem solving, creativity, imagination etc.
Convert your notes from this moment into an anecdote.
DRDP 2015 Measure/s

Provide a minimum of two (2) measures that this anecdote supports
Give the name and number of a DRDP 2015 measures. Example: PD-HLTH 4 Fine Motor Manipulative Skills
Explain why you selected the measure- give example/s from your anecdote of what the child did or said that supports the measure/s
Preschool DRDP 2015: http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/cd/ci/documents/drdp2015preschool.pdf ( (Links to an external site.)Measures at a Glance can be found on the intro page 15):

Infant toddler DRDP-2015: https://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/cd/ci/documents/drdp2015infanttoddler.pdf (Links to an external site.)

Schoolage DRDP-2015: https://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/cd/ci/documents/drdpschoolage2010simp.pdf (Links to an external site.)

Reflection:

Write a detailed paragraph (or 2) addressing the following questions

Describe what the child/ren seemed to be exploring, investigating, trying to figure out or what the child found pleasurable, comforting, or intriguing.
Include examples from your observations.
Interpretation:

Comment on and interpret the learning that occurred (for the child) through this exploration (e.g. spatial awareness, persistence, motor skills, problem solving etc). Support any ideas you have with your observation notes and documentation (photos).
An interpretation is your analysis or understanding of the child’s actions, behavior, and/or language, what they are learning or the skills they are displaying.
Decision Making:

Write a detailed paragraph addressing the following:

Describe what you would do next to support the child’s interest based on what you observed in this experience (a follow up experience).
Back up your ideas to moments you observed during the observation
Implementation:

Sample Solution

mpliance and punish non compliance from the group, the leader has reward and coercive power (French and Raven, 1959). To obtain complete power over the group the leader must gain the trust and belief of the group that they are capable of success, by ensuring the group are both satisfied and meeting performance goals.
The importance of establishing a hierarchy became evident during the planning stage of the outdoor management course for the red team, the coordinators within the team assumed leadership roles but were unable to gain positional power due to the team being a peer group (Pettinger, 2007). The leaders selected had little authority and influence over the group as everyone was perceived to have the same rank, status and occupation, hence the leaders had none of French and Ravens five bases of power (Pettinger, 2007). The result was leaders with no positional power over the group, so could not direct the group with the method of leadership required for the situation. The task had significant constraints, particularly a short time frame and a large group size, for this situation Chelladurai recommends an autocratic leadership style would be most favourable (Chelladurai and Madella, 2006). The leaders attempted an autocratic leadership style, setting individual tasks for the group, however due to the poor leader member relations and lack of positional power the leadership structure quickly became a democracy. The product was an extremely unproductive workforce initially because of the time spent discussing how was best to approach the task. Because of how the leaders were perceived by the group there was little mutual trust, respect or confidence that the leaders were making the correct decisions, and as a result any management style they tried to implement would have been unsuccessful (Pettinger, 2007). Ultimately, if the leaders had analysed their position and the group they would have realised this and chosen a more democratic approach initially the group would have gained trust for the leaders, making future policy implementation easier.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.