Deserts, Deterrence, And Incapacitation

 

 

Select one of these theories and briefly discuss the pros and cons of correctional policies aligned with this theory. Second, using empirical evidence from the assigned readings (or other appropriate sources), argue whether correctional policies aligned with this theory have been successful when implemented in practice. Finally, argue whether the selected theory should be the dominant correctional theory or not. Support your argument.

Sample Solution

Rethinking Rehabilitation: Examining the Effectiveness and Role of Rehabilitation in Corrections

Theory: Rehabilitation

Pros of Rehabilitation-Based Policies:

  • Reduced Recidivism: Rehabilitation programs aim to equip offenders with skills and address the root causes of criminal behavior, potentially leading to lower recidivism rates and a safer society.
  • Positive Transformation: Rehabilitation focuses on personal growth and positive change, aiming to reintegrate offenders into society as productive citizens.
  • Reduced Incarceration Rates: Successful rehabilitation could lead to shorter sentences or alternative sentencing options, reducing overcrowding in prisons.

Cons of Rehabilitation-Based Policies:

  • Cost and Resource Intensive: Effective rehabilitation programs require significant investment in qualified personnel, educational resources, and therapy programs.
  • Limited Effectiveness: Rehabilitation programs may not be equally effective for all offenders, and success rates can vary.
  • Challenges in Measuring Success: Rehabilitation’s long-term impact can be difficult to measure, making it challenging to assess program effectiveness.

Effectiveness in Practice:

Studies on the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs yield mixed results.

  • Meta-analyses (aggregated research reviews) show that some rehabilitation programs, particularly cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) interventions, can modestly reduce recidivism rates (Landenberger & Lipsey, 2005).
  • However, other studies suggest the impact may be minimal or disappear over time (Andrews & Bonta, 2010).

Dominant Theory? Arguments Against:

Rehabilitation should not be the sole focus of corrections for several reasons:

  • Accountability and Justice: Rehabilitation should not overshadow the need for punishment and holding offenders accountable for their actions.
  • Victim Needs: Rehabilitation should not come at the expense of addressing the needs and concerns of victims.
  • Risk and Needs Assessment: Correctional policies should consider the risk an offender poses to public safety and tailor interventions accordingly. High-risk offenders might require more focus on incapacitation alongside rehabilitation efforts.

Dominant Theory? Arguments For:

Despite limitations, rehabilitation offers a path towards reducing recidivism and creating a safer society.

  • Focus on Root Causes: Rehabilitation can address underlying issues like addiction or mental health problems that contribute to criminal behavior.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: In the long run, successful rehabilitation programs can reduce reincarceration costs, a significant financial burden.
  • Humanitarian Concerns: Rehabilitation promotes a more humane approach to corrections, fostering positive change and reintegration.

Conclusion:

Rehabilitation is a valuable tool in corrections, but it should be employed strategically alongside other correctional goals like accountability and victim support. A risk-needs assessment approach that considers the severity of the crime and the offender’s potential for rehabilitation can guide policymakers in developing a comprehensive correctional strategy. Future research should focus on identifying the most effective rehabilitation models for different offender populations.

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.