Differentiation is important to help all students succeed. It is especially important when designing interventions for students who are below grade level or are not meeting a learning goal. You must take into consideration each student’s needs and learning styles to implement a successful intervention strategy.
Using the knowledge gained from the observation and discussion with your mentor teacher in Topic 4, research, develop, and implement an intervention strategy to use with one student in your field experience classroom. Begin by having your mentor teacher guide you in selecting a student that would benefit from additional support, then use research to develop an intervention strategy to meet the student’s needs. Review your strategy with your mentor teacher, make any necessary revisions, and implement the intervention. Afterward, discuss the implementation and its outcome with your mentor teacher.
Spend any remaining field experience hours observing and assisting the teacher in providing instruction and support to the class.
In 250-500 words, summarize and reflect upon your experience creating and implementing the intervention.
Include the following:
A description of the intervention.
The reason the intervention was necessary, including any formal or informal data that supported this conclusion.
The data that was analyzed to support the selected intervention.
The outcome of the intervention, including informal observations and any informal data obtained to measure that outcome.
A synopsis of your discussion with your mentor teacher regarding the implementation and outcome of the intervention. What might you do differently next time? How will you use this in your future practice?
I recently had the opportunity to create and implement an intervention strategy in my field experience classroom. The student I worked with was identified as below grade level based on formal and informal assessments, including observations of her interactions with classmates and her performance on class assignments. This identified a need for additional support in order to help the student reach their learning goals.
To develop an effective intervention strategy, I researched evidence-based interventions that would best meet the needs of the student. After discussing my ideas with my mentor teacher, we developed a targeted behavior plan which focused on positive reinforcement strategies. This included explicit instruction and consistent praise for completing tasks correctly, immediate feedback when incorrect responses were given, as well as frequent breaks throughout the day in order to reduce frustration levels. In addition to this, visual aids were used to reinforce understanding of new concepts being learned in class and generate interest among peers while engaging them in collaborative activities throughout each lesson.
The impact of this intervention was then informally observed through direct interactions between myself, my mentor teacher, and the student during instructional sessions or conversation within our group setting. As such interaction increased over time so did the students overall participation level both inside and outside of class settings as they began taking more initiative over their own learning process rather than relying heavily on prompts from teachers or peers. Furthermore data collected also showed improvements in academic performance across all subjects indicating that particular areas still needed strengthening; however progress had been made regarding general comprehension skills across all content areas studied within our course curriculum thus far.
Following implementation discussion between myself and my mentor teacher revealed strengths about utilizing positive reinforcement strategies alongside other forms of accommodations such as providing visual aides when teaching new material which further helped engage not just target student but also those around them creating a supportive environment conducive towards learning where individual differences could be appreciated rather than judged upon making it easier for every one involved including myself not only take part actively but also reflect upon its outcomes at different stages throughout its duration helping me gain important insight into how I should approach similar situations whilst working professionally later down line if required ever occur .
edman has said that Hong Kong has a Laissez-faire economy because government economic spending in Hong Kong is at most 15 percent of the national income (1998). Laissez-faire is French for “let it do”. In relation to economics, Laissez-faire refers to minimal interference in economics by governments. Hong Kong is very close to having a laissez-faire economy, which has its benefits. Hong Kong is very small in size, and therefore has very few natural resources; despite this, Hong Kong’s economy is booming. Its gross domestic product, GDP, per capita is the 17th highest in the world, at $61, 400 (The World Factbook, 2017). A high GDP per capita indicates a high standard of living because there is a large amount of economic output per person. The higher the GDP per capita is, the more likely it is that the public is satisfied with their country, which subsequently leads to a lower likelihood of political uprisings.
Unlike Marx’s theory that capitalism is only a stage that is overthrown by people who seek out communism after their dissatisfaction with capitalism, the Soviet Union was dissolved because people were unhappy with the communist system. The non-competitive nature of communism has negative implications on all tiers. The working class knows they are guaranteed the same benefits regardless of how much work they’re doing, and how well they’re doing it. The room for economic growth is minimal. At a higher level, there is no competition between firms, which causes a stagnation. No economic growth leads to unhappiness, which leads to political backlash, and revolutions.
Capitalism results in economic growth because it feeds innovation through competition. China has developed an increasingly free market economy. The Soviet Union was innovative whenever they were involved in competing with the United States, but for products only distributed within their nation, it was always the bare minimum. The “invisible hand” of competition, brings the market to a natural equilibrium according to Adam Smith. Competition supports individual growth as well, and eventually results in more specializations of work.
An important distinction between capitalism and communism is the idea of equal opportunity verses equal outcome. Capitalism supports the idea of equal opportunity, but this automatically results in an unequal outcome because of the varying amounts in which different people are willing to work. Communism on the other hand supports the idea of equal outcome. There should be no weal