Detection of Deception
This review will entail a critical analysis of the research that has been conducted in the area thus far. Where controversy exists, the various sides and their empirical support should be supported. A literature review examines the published research relevant to a particular theoretical or practical problem. It is an attempt to organize and integrate research and theory in a specific substantive area. 1) defines and clarifies the problem; 2) summarize previous investigations in order to inform the reader of the state of current research; 3) identifies relations, contradictions, gaps, and inconsistencies in the literature; and 4) suggests the next step or steps in solving the problem
Sample Solution
Detection of Deception
Deception detection refers the extent to which a person can distinguish between honest and deceptive communication. Much research has examined people`s ability to correctly distinguish between honest and deceptive communication. The ability to detect deception is useful, but many misconceptions about effective lie detection have been documented. Research on deception is especially informative because the findings of research often contradict common sense. For example, both folk wisdom and several social scientific hold that lies can be detected through the careful observation of nonverbal behaviors. Yet researchers shows that most of the nonverbal behaviors that are stereo-typically linked with deception have less diagnostic value than presumed. The widely accepted conclusion from decades of research is that while people are statistically better than chance at detecting lies, people are poor lie detectors in an absolute sense, averaging just 54 percent accuracy.
