Watch the Diagnosing Change videoLinks to an external site. for help getting started .
Introduction
Using the organization that your professor has approved, synthesize the organization’s readiness for change. Evaluate whether or not to implement your new program, policy, practice, or procedure. in4-6 pages .
Instructions
In 4-6 pages
Describe the company in terms of industry, size, number of employees, and history.
Analyze in detail the current HR practice, policy, process, or procedure that you believe should be changed.
Formulate three valid reasons for the proposed change based on current change management theories.
Appraise the diagnostic tools that you can use to determine an organization’s readiness for change. Propose two diagnostic tools that you can utilize to determine if the organization is ready for change. Defend why you believe the diagnostic tools selected are the best choice for diagnosing change in the organization.
Using one of the diagnostic tools you selected, assess the organization’s readiness for change:
Provide results of the diagnostic analysis.
Explain the results.
Interpret whether or not the organization is ready for change. Substantiate your conclusion by referencing current change management theories.
The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:
Evaluate an organization’s readiness for change using an appropriate diagnostic tool and citing current change management theories.
in interpretation of current social changes in lifestyles with this ‘major paradigm of sociological thought’ with application to ‘formal rationality’ being ‘purposeful calculation’ in the ‘most efficient’ way for ‘means to an end’ can arguably be the ‘dominant aspect’ in post-modern society than ‘substantive rationality’ prior to that i.e. ‘an orientation towards ideal values and ends’ (Weber, 1904, Parsons, 1981). In the past, rational ideas concerning healthy lifestyles reflected more of an ‘ideal’ state as an end ‘value’ in strengthening beliefs in religion to increase spirituality of the soul with traditional holistic treatments, however, the modern society changed towards ‘formal’ methods ‘to look better, enjoy increased vitality, and enhanced life expectancy’ therefore modern trend towards healthier society arguably links to knowledge of rational choices whereby control over own health is calculated in the most efficient way controllable by each person freely (Weber 1904, Cockerham, Abel and Luschen, 1993). Ritzer and Walczak (1988) analysis of ‘formal rationality’ evidenced that for example, Americans had reduced relying on physicians as the main authority in their health matters, consequently ‘liberating’ the dependence on health ‘experts’ and therefore unlocking the ‘bureaucratic iron cage of dehumanization and overwhelming dependence’ (Ritzer and Walczak 1988, Weber 1904, Cockerham, Abel and Luschen, 1993). To date ‘formal rationality’ has evidenced that in the past society lacked ‘freedom’ or choice to be ‘creative’ in controlling their lifestyles, however, contemporary Weberian scholars have linked ‘formal rationality’ has encouraged freedom of choice for ‘healthier lifestyles’. Weber’s (1904) ‘formal rationality’ concepts was ‘sometimes ambiguous and inconsistent’ in how it was interpreted by sociologists, however, past interpretations on ‘dehumanization’ effects of bureaucratic systems as compared to ‘iron cages’ led to lack of freedom in choice, however, in comparison the contemporary sociologist has reversed the interpretation of the ‘dehumanization’ effects of the ‘iron cage’ to positive liberating the society with Weberian concepts towards gain of a healthier western society (Weber 1904, Cockerham, Abel and Lusche