Diagnosing Change

Watch the Diagnosing Change video for help getting started on your assignment.

Introduction
Using the organization that your professor has approved, synthesize the organization’s readiness for change. Evaluate whether or not to implement your new program, policy, practice, or procedure. You must submit a 4–6-page paper.

Instructions
write a 4–6-page paper in which you:

Describe the company in terms of industry, size, number of employees, and history.
Analyze in detail the current HR practice, policy, process, or procedure that you believe should be changed.
Formulate three valid reasons for the proposed change based on current change management theories.
Appraise the diagnostic tools that you can use to determine an organization’s readiness for change. Propose two diagnostic tools that you can utilize to determine if the organization is ready for change. Defend why you believe the diagnostic tools selected are the best choice for diagnosing change in the organization.
Using one of the diagnostic tools you selected, assess the organization’s readiness for change:
Provide results of the diagnostic analysis.
Explain the results.
Interpret whether or not the organization is ready for change. Substantiate your conclusion by referencing current change management theories.

Sample Solution

Organization diagnosis is a very difficult skill to understand and communicate. They are primarily professional skills resulting from inefficiencies and cultural deficiencies in the corporate and public sector world. Scholars theorize that by using the right model or framework, solutions for adjusting for almost any deficiency in an organization can be quantified or evaluated. This idealism, though broad, is rooted in the history and lessons of the past. That’s why organizational development and transformation (OD & C) is so compelling. Each situation and issue that OD & C professionals need to address is truly unique and is based on a variety of factors, including B. Company values or cultural norms.

wledge of connection. Bowlby’s connection hypothesis permits us to comprehend the human inclination to make solid bonds and the passionate response introduced when these bonds are broken. Bowlby’s proposal is that these connections come from the requirement for security and wellbeing; they foster right off the bat throughout everyday life, are normally coordinated towards a couple of explicit people and will more often than not suffer all through an enormous piece of the existence cycle (Worden, 1991). These connections should be visible in Darwin’s 1872 work around the declaration of feeling in men and creatures where he states Children, while needing food or experiencing in any capacity, shout out noisily, similar to the youthful of most different creatures, halfway as a call to their folks for help, and part of the way from any extraordinary effort serving alleviation. His work would propose that connection is engraved at an early age and this idea is reverberated in Lorenz’s 1935 work with goslings. Lorenz accepted that A breakdown in the relationship with its mom prompted an interruption in the advancement of a bird’s ordinary social conduct, supporting his hypothesis that the primary relationship a bird encounters decides the bird’s future. In like manner, John Bowlby guaranteed that a disturbance in the youngster’s connection to its mom had grave ramifications for their grown-up character (Vicedo, 2009). It is my agreement that in Bowlby’s connection hypothesis, a restless connection style has a drawn out, more convoluted impact after lamenting, an individual with a restless style of connection might encounter further degrees of discouragement, opposite astute a protected connection to the expired, may show less wretchedness and help the change through lamenting and the recuperation from it. This might be that in a restless condition of connection the perished might not have been genuinely accessible to the deprived, and along these lines the dispossessed individual may over-actuate their sorrow reaction. There are a few limits to Bowlby’s connection hypothesis the first being that the model depended on small kids using transitory partitions, which were distressing for the kid, more arrangement could emerge out of a perception of how guardians interface with the kid and what they accommodate each other during normal, non-unpleasant circumstances. How youngsters cooperate with their folks in a non-unpleasant circumstance might give more data on how the connection model functions than how the kid acts when the mother leaves and afterward returns. Optional to this the perceptions occurred using just the essential guardian, for instance, the mother and other family connections may not be described by comparable responses. At long last, the dad or a kin might have a similar connection with the kid simultaneously, relating straightforwardly to grown-ups having more than one essential connection, like soul mate and their youngsters. This shows that connection isn’t simply restricted to outset however experienced on many times all through life including pre-adulthood, early adulthood and then some.

There are a few models of lamenting that can be investigated comparable to disappointed sadness, right off the bat t

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.