1. Explain the difference between attribute data and spatial data and give an example of each. Do we
need to input both data to GIS? Explain your answer
2. Even with the increasing availability of digital sources, why might one still consider tracing from
paper sources for a GIS project?
3. What is the difference between “spatial entities” and “continuous fields”? When we use an entitybased approach and a field-based approach. Give examples.
4. Name four DISADVANTAGES of raster data structure (name more for extra points)
1.
2.
3.
Yes, both attribute and spatial data are necessary when working with GIS; however it is important to note that these two types serve different roles. Attribute data provides additional context for understanding the meaning behind particular locations – for example if you wanted to analyze population densities across cities in a certain region – while spatial data helps visualize where those features can be found on Earth’s surface (Environmental Systems Research Institute). By inputting both forms into GIS software tools we can better analyze our world and make more informed decisions about policy, environmental management practices, public safety initiatives and much more. For instance, if an urban planner was interested in reducing traffic congestion she could combine road layer spatial information from GIS with vehicle ownership rate attribute data from census records to assess potential strategies for improving traffic flow throughout her city (Environmental Systems Research Institute).
His translation is by his own comprehension and not of the real mainland. Would Asia find his portrayal of a female holding a lotus blossom, with a tiger a lovely meaning of their whole landmass. Will Africa see his truly intending that out of the relative multitude of sculptures their female portrayal is topless and seems resting. The area of every sculpture seems to characterize how every landmass was seen, is this because of how Americans saw themselves including what might seem their European accomplices. Europe’s sculptures appears of sovereignty when the area of these figures are situated in a recreation area which was once owed by the very Ruler that America battled to acquire it’s opportunity and who vandalized by eliminating the crowns off the wall which are as yet seen today. At long last we have America who stands conspicuously prepared to participate in any fight as what might turn into America’s genuine position, prepared immediately. Obviously America, it’s specialty and individuals perceived themselves as the one genuine prevalence and every other person was sub-par.
Suggestion: (Remain, Eliminate, Re-contextualize)
The sculptures can stay with one besides of re-contexualizing the model decided to address America. In the event that we decide to keep the sculpture the way things are, there ought to be a plaque introduced to add more verifiable setting of America’s contribution and treatment of Local Americans. I recommend an upgrade evacuation of the whole Public Exhibition hall of Native American. Local American in the present society shouldn’t need to visit a site that addresses a verifiable piece of their reality and American history and feel distressed gazing upward and see Christophe Columbus. All the more critically one adaptation has proactively been systematized for a really long time enhanced by the activities in trustworthy of racial prevalence, it is far time for more extra happy zeroing in on the relational part of Local American history, culture and experience told proudly notwithstanding the convoluted organization previously worked inside the Joins States.
Experience and Bits of knowledge (utilizing the scientif