Diversity management refers to organizational actions that aim to promote greater inclusion of employees from different backgrounds into an organization`s structure through specific programs. Affirmative action refers to a set of policies and practices within a government or organization seeking to increase the representation of particular groups based on their gender, race, or nationality in areas in which they are underrepresented such as employment. Diversity management and affirmative action deal with issues related to discrimination, but in different ways. They are interrelated. Each is directed to achieving equal opportunity in the workplace. While affirmative action focuses on taking positive steps to get individuals into the organization, diversity in the workplace works to change the culture within. Diversity and affirmative action each broaden the concept of equal employment opportunity in different ways. Together, diversity, equal employment opportunity and affirmative action provide a strong foundation for the company`s efforts to achieve a fair and inclusive workplace.
ritical race theory (CRT), is defined as the view that race, instead of being biologically grounded and natural, is socially constructed and that race, as a socially constructed concept, functions as a way to maintain the interests of the white population that assembled it (Curry, T. (2016). Based on CRT, racial inequality emerges in the societal, economic, and legal gaps in which Caucasian individuals create between “races” to keep elite Caucasian interest in labor politics and markets and as such produce the conditions that provide rise to poverty and criminality in many minority communities (Curry, T. (2016). Although the intellectual roots of this movement go back much further, the CRT movement officially organized itself in July 1989.
The initiation of the CRT motion in 1989 indicated its separation from critical legal studies. Instead of drawing theories of social organization and individual behavior from continental European thinkers such as G.W.F. Hegel and Karl Marx or psychoanalytic figures like Sigmund Freud because its theoretical predecessors, as CLS and feminist jurisprudence had completed, CRT was inspired by the American civil rights heritage through figures like Martin Luther King, Jr. (Curry, T. (2016). Being steeped in a revolutionary black idea and civic thinking, critical race theory complex theoretical understandings of the law, politics, and American sociology that concentrated on the attempts of white folks (Euro-Americans) to maintain their historical benefits over individuals of color (Curry, T. (2016).
CRT has spread beyond the confines of private studies to many other fields, especially women’s and gender studies, education, American studies, and sociology (Curry, T. (2016). CRT spin-off movements formed by Asian Americans and by Latinos also have taken hold. The Latino critical concept appeared as an organized group in 1995 and is now a forceful movement in CRT scholarship and activism (Curry, T. (2016). Despite the relatively recent appearance of CRT in academia, some scholars have found it a valuable view on race and racism in America. CRT found what lots of race scholars now take as a commonsense view. CRT scholars hold that the laws and laws in the United States are biased against people of color, and they have focused their scholarship on showing the ways that the authorized institutions support that bias (Curry, T. (2016).
Although there is still some types of segregation within the school system, it has a different face. Most of the curriculum taught within the school’s system is catered towards more middle-class students compared to working-class students, which is unfair. A lot of working-class students have reportedly lower reading and wr
