Dirt Bikes: Initial Management Analysis

 

 

You will be using the Dirt Bikes case study ( will be uploaded separately ) for several of the written assignments in this course. Your first task is to do a general management analysis. Review Dirt Bikes’ company history, organization chart, products and services, and sales and marketing in the Introduction to Dirt Bikes.
Then complete and submit responses to the following three points. Your paper should be 3 pages, double spaced
1. Company summary. Write a ½ page summary of the Dirt Bikes organization. You will re-use this summary for any case analysis on Dirt Bikes, so spend some time creating a succinct description of the company’s mission, products, customers and market, its relevant features (number of employees, volume of business, etc.) and its company culture. What are the competitive and market forces it faces? In a consulting case, this paragraph demonstrates to management that you understand the organization and their business. (you will be able to use this summary for context in future assignments related to the Dirt Bikes case.
2. Give a brief overview of what kinds of information systems and technologies would be the most important for a company such as Dirt Bikes to support its business processes? Explain each item and tell how it could be used and would benefit the company.
3. Using applicable economic analysis tools you have studied (such as value chain, core competencies, competitive forces, and network economics) outline the strategic and competitive position of the firm. Identify ways that technology and information systems might support their strategic position and competitive advantage. You might want to consider some of the following. Which activities at Dirt Bikes create the most value? How does Dirt Bikes provide value to its customers? What about the competition (How do their products compare in price to those of Dirt Bikes? What are some of the product features they emphasize?)? What are the competitive forces that can affect the industry? What competitive strategy should Dirt Bikes pursue? What information systems best support that strategy?
Be sure to cite any and all sources correctly so that your academic integrity is not called into question.
Kenneth C. Laudon and Jane P. Laudon. 2020. Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm, Fifteenth Edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. (ISBN-10: 0-135191793; ISBN-13: 978-0-135191798). Textbook is also available as electronic rental through Vitalsource .
Web information will NOT be acceptable sources for your paper so you should go beyond a standard Google. You can use the ESC library databases or use Google Scholar. If you use Google Scholar through the ESC library, it will allow you to see which of the articles are available to you from the ESC library.– Note that Google Scholar may be found listed in the Article Databases under “G”.

 

 

Sample Solution

loss (PBAC score) was 172.08±41.50 which reduced to 11.76±22.72 at 3 months and 3.97±10.96 at 6 months with treatment. There was significant reduction in menstrual blood loss in patients with levonorgesterol IUCD. The results of this study (table-2) suggests that the rise in haemoglobin level at the end of 6 months of treatment was 10.64±1.99 compared to the pretreatment level of 9.78±1.29. The rise in haemoglobin level at the end of 6 months was significant. The mean endometrial thickness (Table-2) in the pretreatment group was 10.02±3.15 and there was decrease in mean endometrial thickness at the end of 6 months 5.43±1.21 of treatment with levonorgesterol IUCD.
Shalini et al[7] studied 40 patients with dysfunctional uterine bleeding and found a statistically significant increase in haemoglobin concentration (9.84 to 10.06g/dl) and fall in mean PBAC score of 199.45±30.23 before treatment to 53.18±14.73 after 6 months of treatment with levonorgesterol IUCD.
Taru G et al[2] studied 70 women with levonorgesterol IUCD insertion for heavy menstrual bleeding which resulted in reduction in menstrual blood loss to 79% after 6 months of insertion. Improvement in haemoglobin levels from 8.16 to 9.35±0.7g% by 6 months.
There are no much studies conducted comparing oral ormeloxifene and levonorgesterol IUCD in the management of dysfunctional uterine bleeding.
In our study, no major side effects were seen with both oral ormeloxifene and levonorgesterol IUCD. Only 4 patients out of 40 treated with levonorgesterol IUCD had history of spotting pervagina.
In our study both oral ormeloxifene and levonorgesterol IUCD had significant reduction in pictorial blood loss assessment chart score , decrease in endometrial thickness and increase in haemoglobin concentration after treatment for 6 months in patients with dysfunctional uterine bleeding.
Both oral ormeloxifene and levonorgestrel IUCD treatment modalities were safe. Both were efficacious in treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding. No statistical significant differe

This question has been answered.

Get Answer