Discrimination towards LGBTQ+ individuals concerning equal housing

 

 

• Review your Course Announcements for possible information related to this week’s Discussion and Assignment.
• Review the Learning Resources on prioritizing strategies Consider the instructions and examples for prioritizing strategies when planning a community needs assessment.
• Reflect on the social problem that you chose for the Final Project. Then, complete the Prioritizing Strategies Worksheet (Parts I and II) located in the Learning Resources.
BY DAY 4
Post a brief description of the social problem that you selected for your Final Project. Then, describe the top five strategies that you prioritized to address the problem and prevent its recurrence. Explain your reasoning for prioritizing these strategies, including how the time and resources it would take to implement each strategy influenced your decision making.

SOCIAL PROBLEM
The social problem I chose is discrimination towards LGBTQ+ individuals concerning equal housing, employment, and medical insurance.

 

Sample Solution

LGBTQ+ individuals face discrimination concerning equal housing, employment, and medical insurance. All people who need medical care should be able to see their doctor without worrying about being mistreated, harassed, or denied service outright. Data from the Center for American Progress show that LGBTQ people frequently avoid health care and experience discrimination in these settings, underscoring the importance of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Discrimination in health care settings endangers LGBTQ people`s lives through delays or denials of medically necessary care. For example, after one patient with HIV disclosed to a hospital that he had sex with other men, the hospital staff refused to provide his HIV medication.

abulary information is many times seen as a basic device for second language students on the grounds that a restricted jargon in a subsequent language blocks fruitful correspondence. Highlighting the significance of jargon obtaining, Schmitt (2000) underlines that “lexical information is key to open capability and to the securing of a subsequent language” p. 55) Country (2001) further depicts the connection between jargon information and language use as correlative: information on jargon empowers language use and, on the other hand, language use prompts an expansion in jargon information. The significance of jargon is shown everyday in and out the school. In homeroom, the accomplishing understudies have the most adequate jargon. Specialists like Laufer and Country (1999), Maximo (2000), Read (2000), Gu (2003), Marion and others have understood that the procurement of jargon is fundamental for effective second language use and assumes a significant part in the development of complete spoken and composed texts. In English as a subsequent language (ESL) and English as an unknown dialect (EFL) learning jargon things assumes a crucial part in all language abilities (for example tuning in, talking, perusing, and composing (Country, 2011). Streams and Nunan (1991), moreover, contend that the procurement of a sufficient jargon is fundamental for fruitful second language use on the grounds that without a broad jargon, we will not be able to utilize the designs and works we might have learned for intelligible correspondence. Research has shown that second language perusers depend vigorously on jargon information and the absence of that information is the primary and the biggest impediment for L2 perusers to survive (Huckin, 1995). Underway, when we have a significance or idea that we wish to communicate, we really want to have a store of words from which we can choose to communicate this importance or idea. ”At the point when understudies travel, they don’t convey syntax books, they convey word references” (Krashen, as refered to in Lewis, 1993, p25). Numerous scientists contend that jargon is one of the most significant in the event that not the main parts in learning an unknown dialect, and unknown dialect educational programs should mirror this. Wilkins (1972) states that: ”not much worth in is having the option to create syntactic sentences on the off chance that one lacks the necessary jargon to pass what one wishes on to express … While without punctuation very little can be conveyed, without jargon nothing can be conveyed” p97). Different researchers like Richards (1980) and Krashen (1989), as refered to in Maximo (2000) state many explanations behind committing regard for jargon. “Initial, an enormous jargon is obviously esse

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.