Diversity, inclusion, tribalism

 

Write a report to the Club Chairman of the home club (Mr Matt Tripp, Melbourne Storm or Mr Nick Pappas, Rabbitohs) evaluating the success of their 2021 Round 6 game day (i.e. Melbourne Storm or Rabbitohs). This will involve analyzing and evaluating all three aspects of club performance – from a socio-cultural, sports management, and sports science and coaching perspective. Firstly, you may want to consider what ‘success’ means from this holistic perspective and then evaluate the home club in relation to this. We suggest you use the following four sub-headings in your report – Sports Science and Coaching Socio-cultural Sports Management Executive Summary Sports Science & Coaching – How successful was the home team? (approx. 500 words) You may want to consider – warm up; use of the interchange bench; attack; defense; tactics; injuries and HIA; response to referees call; the coaching or high-performance staff. Socio-cultural – Who was in the crowd? (approx. 500 words) You may want to consider – crowd size, construction of identities (gender, ethnicity, age), diversity, inclusion, tribalism, links to community, the cultural meaning of the game Spor​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​ts Management – Fan Game Day Experience (approx. 500 words) – if attending the Rabbitohs v Wests Tigers match You may want to consider – the entertainment value of attending the game, what generated entertainment, what mechanisms were used to generate enthusiasm and crowd involvement, the cost of the experience, getting to and from the game. Sports Management – Experience from a broadcast and spectator view (approx. 500 words) – if watching the Storm v Roosters match on TV You may want to consider – was the match day experience a success from both a broadcast and spectator perspective? In your analysis you may want to use broadcast ratings as well as the live attendance, excitement of the match (both the spectacle and also other entertainment provided), crowd involvement, pre-game entertainment, cost of tickets and general satisfaction of both spectators and TV viewers. Executive summary (approx. 500 words) Commendations (Notes: identify three things that contributed the most to the success of the club; Justify your evaluation). Recommendations (Notes: identify three aspects that could improve and would contribute to improving the success of the club; Justify your evaluation; if possible provide s​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​uggestions/strategies).

Sample Solution

also modified rockets. Ballistic devices have an impressive range. Of the shortest range of action, we mention the 9M22U 122mm, 66.2kg rockets and the most commonly used -40km – are the 122mm WS-1E missiles weighing 74kg. Generally, most rockets have at least 4 kg of active explosive, and are capable of causing considerable damage. Generally speaking, these missiles are used in the following way : for targets up to 6 km, 81-122mm mortars are used; Up to 12km are used Qassam series missiles (90-115mm); Up to 40 km are used Grad / Katyusha 122mm missiles; Up to 80km are used modified rockets Fajr – 3 of 240mm . Most of these missiles are produced directly in Gaza by assembling components. In fact, a significant amount comes illegally and clandestinely from Iran or Russia.
If we want a brief outlook on Hamas ballistic capabilities, Cast Lead (or The Gaza War) provides data that highlights an extremely powerful capacity. During these confrontations that lasted from December 27, 2008 to January 18, 2009, Hamas launched more than 600 rockets, most of them Qassam (nearly 400) of 90-122mm in an area of over 70 square kilometers . To this, over 300 mortars and nearly 900 HTR (high-trajectory rounds) are added. The main targets of these launches were the Israeli cities Beersheva, Hebron, Jerusalem, Ramallah and Tel Aviv . As in the Lebanon war of 2006, Hamas also confirmed the lack of accuracy in addressing strategic objectives of the IDF. Thus, many of the missiles launched did not cause any damage to the enemy, and many of them have accidentally hit civilian targets. However, most rockets hit both civilian and military targets (especially in the southern area of Israel), causing a strong psychological and media impact .
Hamas’s defense strategy aims to use the urban agglomeration in maximum terms, where the movement manages to carry out its actions using the civilian population as a possible threat to I.D.F. threats. During the Gaza War, defense was conceived in three major urban centers – Rafah – Khan Yunis – Gaza City – around which security zones were built . The strip had three lines of defense – 1. the central zone of the city (defended by elite troops – commanders); 2. City entrance area – Defended by light brigades disposed in the eastern area in the form of semicircle; 3. the first line of defense (in the form of a security border) along the 64 km of the strip . In fact, the strategy designed by the leaders of the movement is very interesting to avoid a possible encirclement. Underneath each city, they dug long miles of tunnels through which they went outside the city, having the ability to surprise the enemy by attacking back attacks .
As for defensive weapons, Hamas uses the following defensive devices :
‘ Anti-tank devices ‘ RPG 7 Types; SAGGER AT ‘ 3; ATGM 4 ( Anti Tank Guided Missle)
‘ Antiaircraft ‘ SA ‘ 7 Types

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.