Documentary Analysis

 

 

 

 

Documentary films make their arguments many ways: images, words, sounds, music, cinematic techniques. Your job is to analyze the rhetorical strategies and film techniques the filmmaker uses to make their point.

You can organize your analysis frame by frame, sequence by sequence. You can focus on one representative segment in detail. You can follow a particular motif.

Do not try to cover everything. Choose those portions you think are the most significant.
Explain why these seem the most persuasive. Analyze how the filmmaker uses them (and/or the techniques and devices therein) to present and/or support the argument.

 

 

 

 

 

Sample Solution

In the documentary film “The People’s Platform,” director Astra Taylor explores how technology and media have come to shape our culture in ways that are both beneficial but also potentially damaging. To this end, the filmmaker makes use of a variety of rhetorical strategies and cinematic techniques which ultimately help bring her argument to life.

For instance, early on in the film Taylor interviews several experts who speak about how digital technologies have allowed people greater access to information than ever before while simultaneously making it difficult for certain voices to be heard clearly amongst all the noise online (Taylor 2014). This idea is then visually reinforced later on as images of various crowds push against each other illustrating how content is struggling for attention yet still remains drowned out by others vying for similar recognition.

Additionally, throughout her piece Taylor regularly adopts an observational approach which allows viewers time absorb what they’re seeing without having any forced insights or conclusions being made on their behalf. This style of filmmaking helps create a sense of personal engagement between audience members & themes discussed since no answers are given rather spaces are opened up for further contemplation allowing individuals interpret what they see with greater sincerity (Klein 2021).

Finally, music plays a major role here providing both emotional depth as well as certain rhythm behind what is taking place on screen. At times, melodies foreshadow future events while other pieces illustrate connections between seemingly unrelated scenarios thus helping provide viewers additional context when considering implications presented by footage being shown. All together these techniques form powerful narrative capable conveying complex ideas concisely leaving lasting impressions upon audiences who watch them.

 

The Revenger’s Tragedy

Misfortune of Avengers What sort of misfortune is this? By definition, the misfortune is “a staggering, excruciating, dismal occasion”. Notwithstanding, the awfulness of Avengers doesn’t uncover every one of these highlights. It is frightful and abnormal, loaded with wicked, brutal, dead and maniacal grisly clarifications, however this is certainly not a dismal story. Instead of cause the crowd to feel distress, they regularly draw mind blowing doubtful feelings. The reason for the misfortune isn’t inefficient sorrow, however to utilize retaliation as a persuading intends to cause contempt.

Shakespeare’s “Hamlet” shows the overall components found in the awfulness of the retribution of the renaissance (“misfortune of vengeance”). Be that as it may, despite the fact that Hamlet is a misfortune of vengeance, Shakespeare confounds the essential retribution plot by making three vengeance plots. By including significant advancements, Shakespeare makes ‘Ship of the Concentric Revenge Miwa’ (Frye 90) which is definitely not a physical legend yet a phantom, not an apparition, yet a scholarly saint who is an issue. did. viewpoint

In this investigation of retribution and vengeance of Elizabeth ‘s vengeance, the two plays I see are the “Hamlet” of William Shakespeare and “The Tragedy of Avengers” of Thomas Middleton. After first observing the treatment of the dramatist ‘s Avengers’ character, different characters in the play will deal with the Avengers. Despite the fact that their essential topic and shows are comparable, the two plays show a differentiating picture of vengeance; rather than “Vindicator’s misfortune”, Hamlet is an increasingly complex of his hero Provide treatment restricted by the creator’s social data and lacking

The awfulness of vengeance (some of the time called retribution dramatization, vengeance show or grisly misfortune) is a sort of hypothesis whose fundamental subject is the deadly aftereffect of vengeance and retribution. American instructor Ashley H. Thorndiek formally reported the awfulness of vengeance in the 1902 article “Connection among Hamlet and contemporary retribution show”, recorded the advancement of the hero’s retribution plan, and frequently killers and Avengers Brought about his own passing. This sort previously showed up in the early current British distributed by Thomas Kid’s “Misfortune of Spain” in the last 50% of the sixteenth century. Early works, for example, Jasper Heywood ‘s Seneca (1560’ s), Thomas Norton and Thomas Sackville ‘s play Gorbuduc (1561) were additionally viewed as a misfortune of vengeance. Different misfortunes of renowned retribution incorporate the awfulness of William Shakespeare’s Hamlet (1599-1602), Titus Andronics (1588-1593), Thomas Middleton’s Avengers (around 1606).

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.