Effective followership and servant leadership within the army.

 

Write a short essay comparing and contrasting effective followership and servant leadership within the army.

 

Sample Solution

Effective followership and servant leadership within the army

In the army, servant leaders bring others in to make decisions before making one that is not ideal for everyone. Followers serve leaders in giving them opinions and ideas, offering help whenever it is needed. Servant leadership can go hand in hand with followership. Though different, they do share some similarities. Both philosophies share the use of the army values. When either a servant leader or a follower you have to be loyal, respect, and do your duty to those above you. Both of these terms look at improving not only soldiers and interpersonal relationships, but also an organization as a whole. Followership and servant leadership exist and feed off one another to develop cohesion and the greatest outcomes.

management as everyone would expect(2016). He goes on the name them as; 1) Dramatic changes, which will in turn lead to ultra-low-cost rivals, and there will be extra power to the customers. The author states that fresh social demands highlight invention above optimization and also change above continuity. 2) Collaboration tools that are web-based and networks a substitute to a formal chain of command; 3) the fresh anticipations that Generation Facebook comes up with. This generation sees the web as a universal life operating system in which they have fun with.

A bureaucracy is a model of organization centered on guidelines, chain of command, impersonality and labor division. It has been the leading system of organization for more than a century. Grey argues that Post-bureaucracy is built on confidence, enablement, personal conduct as well as collective responsibility(2006). But it carries its own difficulties in control loss, inequity as well as risk. The generation Facebook expect the work’s social environment to be a reflection of the social content in the web. The author says that they will utilize the 12 realities so as to determine whether a company is with it.

The first reality that the author states is that all ideas on the web compete on an equal footing. In the Web, ideas ought to compete sovereign from the individual who came up with them. Every idea has merit and has to be treated in an equal way. (Hamel, 2016). Another reality which the author talks about is that contribution counts for more than credentials. It’s what one is capable of and the actions they take, not their school of education or what they are qualified to do. What matters most is what an individual contributes but not their credentials (Hamel, 2016).

The third reality states that hierarchies are built bottom up. It’s insufficient to have a regular managerial structure, it is also essential to let fresh groups to form, in a natural way just as it happens on the Web. There is a strong requirement for self-managed teams with this group. In all online Web forums, there are always the people who normally get more attention and respect from people than others; they as a result have more influence whenever they say anything. It is worth noting that these individuals do not get any sort of appointments from any superior persons. Hamel (2016) says that it is instead their influence which is comes out freely from the approval they get from their peers. Authority on the Web never trickles downward, but upwards. The author says that Leaders serve rather than preside. A comma

This question has been answered.

Get Answer