Elon Musk cofounded Neuralink in 2016.
He noted his goal is to create a chip that could enable a "brain-computer interface." On Tuesday 9th, Musk and various senior staffers at Neuralink presented the company's ambition to design a chip capable of being implanted in the human brain that could receive and transmit signals to the organ. According to Musk, the company has already had some success — with monkeys. Here is what we know thus far:
Elon Musk's neurotechnology company, Neuralink, has pulled back the veil on its ambitions to implant chips in people's brains.
During a Q&A session at a live presentation on Tuesday, Musk surprised his Neuralink colleagues by announcing that the firm had tested its technology on monkeys with some success.
Musk said "a monkey has been able to control a computer with its brain," though he did not elaborate further on what this involved.
Neuralink's president, Max Hodak, said that he wished the company didn't have to experiment on animals but that it's a necessary "step in the process."
Research Internet and reputable information sources to examine the impact of this current event. Summarize your findings and write at least a one-page word document. In your report you will also need to address and respond to the following questions:
From your point do you think CBI is a natural evolution in our Digital Transformation? Why or why not?
Examine and evaluate the social impact in terms of human behavior and interactions with such technology? Try to list the pros and cons and note the winners and losers
Knowing that every technology will lead to the creation of more technology, what would envision as the most likely next technology that will come as a result of using Neuralink?
PS; please see attached picture for screenshot
Sample Solution
From my point of view, the development of a brain-computer interface (BCI) is an important step in digital transformation. BCIs have already been used to help individuals with physical disabilities by providing them with a direct connection between their brains and machines that enable them to control physical objects or perform everyday tasks. This technology could also be used to improve cognitive functions, such as memory and decision making, which could lead to improved quality of life. Additionally, the implantation of BCIs could provide insight into how the human brain works and how this knowledge can be applied in other areas.
However, there are still many ethical concerns surrounding BCIs that need to be addressed before they can become widely available. The safety of these implants has yet to be fully tested while potential side effects cannot be ruled out at this stage. Moreover, if BCIs are implanted in humans without consent or proper safeguards in place it poses serious risks for people’s privacy and autonomy – especially when dealing with sensitive personal information stored inside the device. As such, further research into developing safe methods for implanting these devices should take precedence over implementing them on a wide scale basis.
In conclusion, I believe that CBI has great potential for improving our digital transformation but we must address all associated ethical issues first before moving forward with its widespread implementation.
eye to it based on faith in autonomous auditing organizations. These standards can be supplemented by both qualitative and quantitative concepts. Reworking the auditing boundaries by segregation of tasks between the insiders and the outsiders (separation of task from ownership). Also, by hindering the propagation of self-structured image of companies through networks. Internal seniors and auditing company can also define information sharing system that is more transparent for the actors analyzing the final report (sans any restriction from either institution).