Emerging threats and counter measures | COMPLIANT PAPERS

Emerging threats and counter measures

Published by admin at January 27, 2021

Categories

Accounting

Tags

Emerging threats and counter measures

Many business environments have both visible and invisible physical security controls. You see them at the post office, at the corner store, and in certain areas of your own computing environment. They are so pervasive that some people choose where they live based on their presence, as in gated access communities or secure apartment complexes. Alison is a security analyst for a major technology corporation that specializes in data management. This company includes an in house security staff (guards, administrators, and so on) that is capable of handling physical security breaches. Brad experienced an intrusion—into his personal vehicle in the company parking lot. He asks Alison whether she observed or recorded anyone breaking into and entering his vehicle, but this is a personal item and not a company possession, and she has no control or regulation over damage to employee assets. This is understandably unnerving for Brad, but he understands that she’s protecting the business and not his belongings.

When or where would you think it would be necessary to implement security measures for both?

Sample Solution

dependant upon if Finerty accepted the terms of Skjonsby’s original offer. The acceptance of an offer may only be valid if it is express or implied directly to the offeror. It must fall within the prescribed time constraints, and acceptance must be absolute and unconditional. Making a counter offer automatically rejects the prior offer, and requires an acceptance under the terms of the counter offer or there is no contract. On October 1, Finerty responded to Skjonsby’s proposed form contract with a counter offer, stating that “three changed need to be made” and he will sign the contract. This signified a rejection to the original offer. Two of the changes were resolved, and on October 17, Dataserv offered a remedy to the final change. Technology did not respond. On November 8, Dataserv offered to remove the clause that was causing the delay, and Technology responded by revoking their intent to purchase the “features.” Finerty never accepted the terms to the proposed contract, therefore there was never an acceptance.

Dataserv and Technology Enforceability

Whether or not Technology is liable for the difference between the sale price of the features and the contract price depends on if a contract was ever formed for which they would be responsible for payment. A valid contract is formed when one party, the offeror, makes an offer that is accepted by the other party the offeree. The offeror is free to revoke the offer at any point before the offeror accepts. Making a counter offer automatically rejects the prior offer, and requires an acceptance under the terms of the counter offer or there is no contract. Dataserv offered certain IBM computer “features” for the price of $100,000 to Technology on August 29. On September 6, Dataserv sent a proposed contract for this sale, and after over a month of back and forth, the two parties did not come to an agreement. On November 8, Technology communicated to Dataserv that “the deal was not going to get done…” At this point, any possibility of an agreement was dismissed. A contract was never formed between the two parties. Technology cannot be held liable for the difference between the sale price of the features and the contract pric

This question has been answered.

Get Answer

Testimonials

Awesome Writers

When I ordered my paper, even me i couldn’t understand some of the things the professor needed. My writer first tutored me to ensure we were on the same page, and proceeded to deliver a masterpiece. It was too good to be true. I still use this site hitherto.

McCarty

Wiley