Entrepreneur or business person who is responsible for making decisions

 

 

1) As an entrepreneur or business person who is responsible for making decisions that impact your organization both internally and externally, describe how you make decisions when they conflict with your personal ethics and instincts? What personal values and ethical standards do you consider most important when making decisions? Provide an example that you have experienced or observed that supports the idea of trusting your intuition and ethical beliefs.

Sample Solution

Entrepreneur or business person who is responsible for making decisions

Ethics are defined as moral principles that govern a person`s or group`s behavior. Therefore, in an ideal world, ethics should play the ultimate role when making a decision. If ethics are the principles which guides one`s behavior then, ideally, all decisions should be made entirely based on ethics. Unfortunately, such is not always the case. A few problems arise when one tries to make an ethical decision, especially as a leader. When making a decision that is conflicting with your personal ethics and instincts, stick to what you know and what you believe in because that is your foundation of knowledge (Colangelo, 1999).

South Carolina. The Confederate states were known for their extraordinary military abilities under the standard Robert E. Lee, and the General which drove the Union to triumph. De-centralization frustrated the alliance’s capacity to arrange the conflict endeavors. Such state’s freedoms, A.) failure to raise assets through charges confederate states opposed tax collection B.) powerlessness to pass enrollment regulations, the confederate states battled all alone. The South needed adequate yield utilization farming and wasteful transportation framework. There was restricted railroad lines accessible the south had 9,500 miles versus 22,000 miles for the North.

The contention about the South was about the versatility. The South was not such presented to railroad tracks however much the North was. Since they didn’t have the portability like the North did they couldn’t move weapons, explosive, projectiles, warriors, or any guide like attendants or food. The South was running out of military personals, the South would not involve slaves for military purposes. The justification behind that was on the grounds that the South expected that the slaves would have defiance. General Grant and Sherman involved Richmond, Virginia this prompted General Lee giving up in Virginia on April 9, 1865 at the Appomattox Courthouse. The impressions of the common conflict, 1,000,000 fighter died. 600,000 losses on the alliance, and 400,000 in the association. The South lost one fourth of its male populace, it was an annihilation of the Southern economy and culture.

All in all, the Civil War will fill in as a learning ground for America. The states had capacity to withdrew. This was the bloodiest conflict on America’s dirt, it filled in as an image, of what activities man can do when the country isn’t joined together. The Civil War made numerous new regulations and changes, like the Fourteenth Amendment, which allowed all public brought into the world in the United States with citizenship and equivalent freedoms. Implying that no resident could be denied their public conceived privileges in view of shading, race, or religion. The Fifteenth Amendment which conceded all residents the option to cast a ballot. Nonetheless, in light of the fact that African Americans were allowed with equivalent privileges, that implies that they were dealt with similarly. Plessy v. Ferguson “separate yet equivalent regulation” blacks would be proceeding to be dealt with under a Caucasian citizenship. In different cases, a few cases that without a common conflict US nation may as yet be seeing blacks and other race individuals secon

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.