Entry-level police officer position by three high-ranking members of a police agency

 

Imagine yourself being interviewed for an entry-level police officer position by three high-ranking members of a police agency. You will respond to
three different situations involving corruption. This assignment will help you apply what you have learned about ethical leadership to real-world situations. You
will need to consider the scenarios carefully, craft an answer to each scenario, and have research to defend your answer. In an interviewing situation, the
interviewer may challenge your answer, even if it is the appropriate answer. That is why it is important to have a prepared argument that includes supporting
research.
You will need to respond to the following three situations.
Situation A
As a newly hired police officer, you respond to an alarm call at 3 a.m. with your field training officer. Upon arrival, you find that a pharmacy has been broken into,
and when you walk inside, you see another officer already on scene. This officer, who you know has 30 years on the job, takes a candy bar worth $1 off the shelf
and begins to eat it. It is clear that he did not pay for it and has no intention of leaving money behind.
Will you do or say anything about this situation? If you decide to do something, what will your action entail? If you decide to not react, provide a rationale for
your choice.
Situation B
As a newly hired police officer, you work daily with a field training officer as well as three other officers on the 11 p.m.–7 a.m. shift. You have noticed on several
occasions that there is an odor of liquor when one particular officer comes into the locker room before the shift. You have had conversations with him and he
has told you that he goes out to dinner before he comes into work and has a couple drinks but that it is no big deal. This particular field training officer has a lot
of experience and is trusted within the community and organization. When you were hired, you were told that the organization is implementing a plan to weed
out corruption that is occurring in the field. The plan being implemented is not about officers drinking on the job, but you are concerned that if you do not say
something regarding this behavior, he is going to hurt someone. You are worried that if you do say something, there may be retaliation against you.
Explain what you will do in this situation. Will you say something to your field training officer? Why or why not?

 

Sample Solution

You are not automatically a police officer just because you work at a police agency. There are numerous positions available that provide opportunities for various people to join the area of law enforcement. Within a police agency, there are primarily two different job categories: sworn and non-sworn. The Full List of Police Department Positions: Part 1 Positions Not Sworn) The sworn roles available within the police department will be the subject of the second section of our guide to working for the police. The police officer position is the one that frequently shows up in job listings. This position is sworn in,

mages that are frequently alluded to in common claims are financial harms and non-monetary harms. A monetary harm is any expense that is a consequence of the respondent’s activities. For instance, doctor’s visit expenses or cash to fix things. Non-financial harms allude to close to home pressure, post-awful pressure issue, and different effects not connected with cash. A cap on harms “restricts how much non-financial harm pay that can be granted to an offended party” (US Legal Inc).

Covers on harms are the most well-known practice of misdeed change. In New Mexico, Susan Seibert says that she was hospitalized for over nine months as a result of a specialist screwing up during her gynecological technique. Subsequent to suing, she should get $2.6 million in punitive fees, which was then diminished to $600,000 due to a cap on harms. Seibert actually experiences inordinate measures of obligation because of not being given the legitimate measure of cash that she merited. Covers on harms profoundly influences the offended parties for a situation. As priorly referenced, offended parties sue since they need cash to completely recuperate from the difficulty wherein they persevered because of the respondents activities.

A kind of misdeed change that isn’t too known is specific clinical courts. Presently, all clinical negligence courts have juries that have practically no foundation with respect to clinical data. This has been functioning admirably on the grounds that it implies that a fair-minded decision is chosen. Nonetheless, the association Common Good is attempting to pass the making of exceptional clinical courts. In this, the jury and pass judgment on will be prepared clinical experts who will profoundly assess the case. Advocates for this court feel that individuals will be better made up for what they truly merit. Nonetheless, most of the feelings on this court are against the possibility of ths. The most finished up assessment of the people who go against this new framework accept that it would put the patients in a difficult situation. Almost certainly, the prepared clinical adjudicators and juries will favor the specialist/specialist/litigant than agreeing with the offended party. They trust that the most fair and proficient method for making a decision about clinical negligence cases is utilize the current common equity framework. One of the most well known clinical negligence cases including Dana Carvey was finished in a settlement, yet cou

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.