Environmental scientist working as a researcher for a contract research organization

As an environmental scientist working as a researcher for a contract research organization (CRO), your organization has been hired by a local university’s environmental science department to consider a number of potential research studies for their undergraduate research program. Specifically, your supervisor has asked that you consider this specific research question:
“How can we ensure that drinking water derived from groundwater of select aquifers, lakes, and rivers is acceptable for human consumption?”
You have been asked to present a PowerPoint (PPT) presentation to the university on a suggested general research design to address this unique environmental health research question. In your presentation, you will need to include the information below.
-Title slide
-Research question restated as a problem statement
-Identification of what possible human health impacts may exist for humans using these sources as drinking water
resources
-Identification of what possible environmental health impacts may exist for the environment using these sources as -drinking water resources
-How to determine appropriate sampling locations
-How to appropriately sample any water or soil matrices
-Suggested laboratory test list for any water or soil samples (e.g., heavy metals, pesticides, dissolved oxygen, pH, etc.)
-Suggested regulatory limits with which to compare against the analyzed sample results
References slide
You are required to include a minimum of one slide for each bulleted item, but the presentation must consist of at least 14 slides, not counting the title slide and reference slides. Also, you are required to use your textbook, two peer-reviewed scholarly articles, and one national environmental agency’s published regulatory limits in your research. Adhere to APA Style when creating citations and references for this assignment.

 

Sample Solution

It seems to be the case that capital punishment can be justified on moral grounds as it does more good than harm. In John Stuart Mill’s “Speech in Favor of Capital Punishment,” he argues that capital punishment is the most appropriate “mode in which society can attach to so great a crime the penal consequences which for the security of life it is indispensable to annex to it.” He argues this for many reasons. His first point is that capital punishment is more humane to the criminal than the prison system. At first glance, it appears that the death penalty is cruel and unusual because we, as humans, are scared to inflict death on another human, no matter what crime has been committed. However, Mill argues that while the “short pang of a rapid death” seems merciless, caging a criminal “in a living tomb” for a “long life in the hardest and most monotonous toil…debarred from all pleasant sights and sounds, and cut off from all earthly hope” is far crueler than it seems (Mill). This is seen in examples from Aaron Rodriguez to Mark Salling to Adolf Hitler. All of these people would rather commit suicide and die than be sentenced to life in prison. Thus, it can be argued that prison is “less severe indeed in appearance…but far more cruel in reality” (Mill).

Because of capital punishment’s appearance of severity, it serves as an effective deterrent for crime. Someone who is thinking of committing a horrible crime might not do so if he knows there is a possibility of death if he is caught. Some would argue that capital punishment does not deter crime, but Mill responds to this by asking, “Who is there who knows whom it has deterred?” to make the point that we cannot be certain how many people were or were not deterred from committing a crime because of the threat of the death penalty. Furthermore, he points out that the “influence of a punishment is not to be estimated by its effect on hardened criminals,” but rather the “impression it makes on those who are still innocent” (Mill). While it may seem that crime is not being deterred, the threat of capital punishment does influence people to not commit crimes. Imagine if there was no alarming threat of punishment for murder; certainly, there would be more murders. Capital punishment deters crime, which thus prevents unhappiness.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.