Equilibrium Activity

 

 

Introduction:
For this activity, you are going to simulate an equilibrium process, collect data, share data with your classmates, draw graphs, and answer some questions.
You will be investigating a simple equilibrium reaction: Head ⇌ Tail (this is exactly the same as A ⇌ B)
For the purpose of this exercise, we are going to use coins to denote whether we have a “Head” molecule (H) or a “Tail” molecule (T) – the coin will be Heads up or Tails up.
Head ⇌ Tail means that if a container holds H and T molecules, some H molecules will turn into T molecules and some T molecules will turn back into H molecules. At equilibrium, the number of H and T molecules remains constant because the rate of change will be the same in each direction (for every H that becomes T, a T will become an H).
In this activity, your system will have 10 molecules (coins) that can be either H or T. These will be numbered 1 – 10 (lay the coins on a piece of paper which has the numbers 1 – 10 written on it):
(Note: if you don’t have coins, you could use buttons or pieces of paper with “H” written on one side and “T” written on the other)
One way that molecules react and change is through collisions. As the molecules move around, these collisions are somewhat random, and will sometimes result in the molecule reacting and becoming something else, but not always. There is a probability that a collision will result in reaction: if the probability is 50%, there is a 50/50 chance that a molecule will react when it collides. If the probability is 90%, there is a 90/10 chance that a molecule will react when it collides. In the case of a simple equilibrium process, like the one considered here, the probability of the backwards reaction and the probability of the forwards reaction add up to 100%: if H  T is 90% likely when H experiences a collision, then T  H is only 10% likely when T experiences a collision. This preference for one direction over the other is what controls how much reactant and product is present at equilibrium.
In this activity, you will keep track of the number of H and T molecules over a 15-minute period. This doesn’t mean you’ll be timing anything – you will simply assume that five random collisions happen every minute, so that after you have completed five collisions, you will count the number of H and T molecules and record it as the number after 1 minute. This will be repeated to get the number after 2 minutes and so on for 15 sets of 5 collisions, which we will call 15 minutes.
Check list:
 Watch the Instruction Video (click or ctrl+click this link to see it)
 download the Excel RNG file from Files > Lab Activities > Week1b. Equilibrium Activity
 perform the four experiments below
 submit data to a Googledocs dataset by the deadline given in “Assignments”
 download the lab report sheet from Files > Lab Activities > Week1b. Equilibrium Activity then complete it (including 8 graphs) and turn it in by the due date given in “Assignments”

Instructions:
Expt. 1: 90% chance that a collision turns H into T, starting from all H (H = 10)
1. Set up the coins as shown in the picture above, with all ten Heads up (H = 10).
2. Using the Excel RNG (random number generator):
• Set the “% probability of H changing to T” to 90
• Enter any value into the yellow cell and hit “enter”
3. The RNG randomly chooses the molecules that will experience a collision with a minute. Using the probability you entered, it then randomly chooses whether the molecule reacts or not. For example, it may say that molecule 4 should “Change to T or remain T”. In this case you look at your molecule number 4: if it is currently H, you should turn it over so that it is now T. If it is already T, you should leave it as it is.
4. Do as instructed for each of the five molecules listed, in the order they appear (a molecule might be chosen more than once in the same minute, but that’s okay).
5. You have now completed “1 minute”. Next, create a table in Excel and enter the number of H and T that you have after “1 minute”.
6. Enter another value into the yellow cell and hit “enter” again. This will generate five more collisions and outcomes. Repeat the process of turning over the chosen molecules (or not, if that’s the instruction) for all five molecules, in order.
7. Repeat this process until you have completed “15 minutes” of reaction time. You can now create a graph in Excel. Your table and graph should look something like this:

 

 

 

8. Finally, post your “Number of H” data into a Googledocs document that you can find here: Monday/Wednesday Lab Section Data Entry
Tuesday/Thursday Morning Lab Section Data Entry
Tuesday/Thursday Morning Lab Section Data Entry
Note that all your Googledocs data MUST be submitted by midnight on Thursday (for Wednesday lab group) or by midnight on Friday (for Thursday lab group). You will lose points if your data is not submitted in time.

Expt. 2: 90% chance that a collision turns H into T, starting from all T (H = 0)
1. Set up the coins again, but this time with all ten Tails up (H = 0).
2. Using the Excel RNG, keep the “% probability of H changing to T” set to 90.
3. Enter any value into the yellow cell, hit “Enter” and then repeat steps 4-9 from Expt. 1.
(Make sure you enter your Expt. 2 data into the Googledocs document)

Expt. 3: 10% chance that a collision turns H into T, starting from all H (H = 10)
1. Set up the coins again, but this time with all ten Heads up (H = 10).
2. Using the Excel RNG, change the “% probability of H changing to T” to 10.
3. Enter any value into the yellow cell, hit “Enter” and then repeat steps 4-9 from Expt. 1.
(Make sure you enter your Expt. 3 data into the Googledocs document)

Expt. 4: 50% chance that a collision turns H into T, starting from all H (H = 10)
1. Set up the coins again with all ten Heads up (H = 10).
2. Using the Excel RNG, change the “% probability of H changing to T” to 50.
3. Enter any value into the yellow cell, hit “Enter” and then repeat steps 4-9 from Expt. 1.
(Make sure you enter your Expt. 4 data into the Googledocs document)

Group Data:
Everyone should have entered their data to Googledocs by midnight on Thursday (for Weds lab group) or midnight on Friday (for Thurs lab group). The Googledocs document will not allow entry after this time (or early the next morning, at the latest).
1. Once everyone has entered their data into Googledocs, copy the averaged group data (in the pink cells) to your Excel file containing your own data.
2. Remember that although only “Number of H” is given at each minute, you can easily calculate “Number of T”, because H + T = 10. Also note that the number of H and T in the averaged group data will not be whole numbers. In this case we can think of each H or T representing a mole of molecules rather than single, indivisible molecules.
3. For each of the 4 experiments, create a graph similar to the one you created for your own data.
4. You should now have 8 graphs in Excel. These can all be transferred into the lab report sheet by clicking on the graph, using the “copy” function (ctrl-C) and then once you are in your lab report sheet document, use the paste function (ctrl-V) to paste each graph into the file.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The morals of human upgrade and body change

I feel that the innovative advancement we see today, is generally changing our general public into something we will discover hard to comprehend in less than 10 years.

In the early existences of human presence, we created by development and later by figuring out how to utilize and deliver devices with the reason to make our lives simpler. People have consistently seeked to improve their life.

 

 

 

Today we have an amazingly quickly developing mechanical headway and numerous researcher’s see a future where we are helped out innovation in our bodies. Numerous organizations are creating clinical items, and some are making all the more recently created thoughts which could had been taken out from a sci-fi film, for example, the thought from the organization Sanctuary. Asylum is a counterfeit general insight (AGI) organization having the objective to make machines like us, ready to think and carry on like people. Haven call them synths and is what they will be, manufactured insight, or right? What is insight? What’s more, would we be able to figure out what’s “engineered” insight or just knowledge?

I believe that a portion of the basic premises that lie underneath the way to deal with comprehend insight is that it’s a property of a physical body and can’t be disengaged or segregated from it. Like us people our knowledge developed to help us as a life form to more readily explore and control our condition to assist us with documenting our objectives, and I accept that all together for a synth to comprehend the world similarly as we do, it needs a body that is as near a human body as could reasonably be expected. I imagine that if its body work a similar route as a human body, it will assist manufactured insight with developing ideas and a comprehension of the world that is like the manner in which our own personalities work.

A few organizations are creating human body changes and human improvement in the reason for clinical use, today we see body prosthetics on people being utilized by their cerebrum signs to control their development however sooner rather than later I might suspect we will start to see non-therapeutically body alterations as prosthetics to the body parts we as of now have, joining innovation such that make us more robots.

In any case, making manufactured insight look and act like us people, while we simultaneously make ourselves seem as though engineered knowledge consolidating us with prosthetic body parts, isn’t that creation us nearly the equivalent? We can both think, we have a similar body shape, we are both part robot, and we are one might say both human. When do we arrive at where we are more machine than human? What’s more, would we be able to distinguish synths in a point where they are similarly as people as us.

 

I feel that people will make significant alterations on our body in the following short measure of time and when we arrive at where the contrasts among synths and people are nearly gone, I believe that what will decide an individual from a synth will be that it was conceived as a human and not made from innovation. In any case, on the off chance that you make babies from both “races” which both end at a similar point in life where they are genuinely indistinguishable I wouldn’t state that they were extraordinary! I would state that they would be a similar sort of being, the two of them can think, have sentiments, and carry on as one another. It is state that white individuals are superior to dark individuals! Also, it would be a similar thought since they are genuinely indistinguishable. We would simply have made the outsider we have been searching for the opening time or made another correlation with an individual with another sort of development.

About Essay Sauce

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.