Erik Erikson’s Psychosocial Theory of Development.

 

 

 

 

Erik Erikson believed that we go through a “crisis” at all stages of life that we must overcome according to his Psychosocial Theory of Development. His theory stresses the importance of social interactions on development. For example, babies are in the “trust versus mistrust” stage at birth. You must learn to trust others at an early age as newborns are completely dependent on others for their survival needs such as food, clothing and shelter. They are also dependent on others for their emotional needs such as comfort when frightened or alone.

Describe which stage young adults are in according to Erik Erikson. In addition, explain “relationships” during young adulthood including the role of friendships, romantic relationships and family dynamics. Be sure to paraphrase into your own words and cite your sources properly.

How do you think the pandemic impacted young adults and their relationships with others during this critical time of graduating high school, starting or finishing college, entering the job market and “launching’ from the family home?

Sample Solution

Erik Erikson`s Psychosocial Theory of Development

Erik Erikson’s psychosocial stages of development focus on the resolution of different crises to become a successful, complete person. Erikson`s stages of psychosocial development include: trust vs. mistrust; autonomy vs. shame/doubt; initiative vs. guilt; industry vs. inferiority; identity vs. role confusion; intimacy vs. isolation; generativity vs. stagnation; and integrity vs. despair. The sixth stage, intimacy versus isolation, takes place during young adulthood between the ages of approximately 19 and 40. The major conflict at this stage of life centers on forming intimate, loving relationships with other people. Success at this stage leads to fulfilling relationships. Struggling at this stage, on the other hand, can result in feelings of loneliness and isolation.

 

 

exposition on facebook friendshipThe Internet these days assumes a critical job in individuals’ professions, connections, and different circles of life. Since it began to pick up ubiquity in the mid 1990s, it has transformed into a worldwide system, associating any person who can manage the cost of having a PC to the remainder of the world.

Bit by bit, administrations permitting to make new companions and to keep in contact with previously obtained companions began to show up, and today billions of individuals utilize different interpersonal organizations, of which the biggest is Facebook. These informal organizations despite everything stay a discussed wonder, just as the outcomes they lead to and the manner in which they have changed social orders. Furthermore, maybe, one of the weirdest (at any rate to me) marvels associated with them is Facebook companionship.

A Facebook kinship is adding an individual to your rundown of companions. As I would like to think, this is a sensible activity with individuals whom you care about, or whom you keep up a relationship with. Genuine companions, guardians, your beloved(s), partners with whom you spend time with after work, individuals whom you have warmed up to while voyaging, etc, should be available in any Facebook companion list.

Be that as it may, in reality, individuals include new individuals whom they have never met or known. Regardless of whether they have never traded words, they despite everything keep each other in their companion records. Or on the other hand another model is when associates who work in a similar office include one another, yet don’t speak with one another in Facebook or even in the workplace. Or on the other hand when irregular individuals who have (under certain conditions) conveyed for a few minutes, at that point add each other to their companion records. At times individuals even add different clients to their companion records for a demonstration of amount—maybe, it is intended to show how friendly they are. These, just as numerous other comparable cases, I don’t comprehend, and this is one reason why I have stopped utilizing informal organizations about a year back.

Companion records can be a wellspring of different aggravations. For instance, individuals some of the time are reluctant to erase such arbitrary “companions” from their rundowns, due to expecting an issues associated with this demonstration—managing someone’s feelings, for instance, or clarifying their reasons. Or maybe regularly, erasing individuals from Facebook companions should show the pace of dissatisfaction or outrage caused to a client by the erased individuals. Simultaneously, genuine correspondence frequently proceeds as though nothing spe

 

 

 

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.