Essay on Politics: Nixon and Machiavelli

 

Write an essay in which you analyze the excerpt from Niccolo Machiavelli’s book, The Prince, that
appears in our Barnet book. The purpose of an analytical essay is to divide a topic into several sections in
order to give the reader a better understanding of it. Machiavelli’s thesis is this: “. . . it is necessary for a prince
[political leader] wishing to hold his own to know how to do wrong, and to make use of it or not according to
necessity” (644). Machiavelli seems to be arguing here that “the ends justify the means” (although he never
actually uses this phrase in The Prince).
Based on Niccolo Machiavelli’s arguments, does the character of President Richard M. Nixon in director Oliver
Stone’s film Nixon represent a Machiavellian “Prince”? Why or why not? If your answer is “yes,” explain how
Nixon’s words and actions illustrate the advice Machiavelli offers to political leaders.
Divide Machiavelli’s argument into several sections in order to give your audience a better understanding of it.
Machiavelli’s thesis is this: “. . . it is necessary for a prince [political leader] wishing to hold his own to know
how to do wrong, and to make use of it or not according to necessity” (644). Machiavelli seems to be arguing
here that “the ends justify the means” (although he never actually uses this phrase in The Prince).
Please use examples from each of the following sources to support your thesis:
Machiavelli’s The Prince.
Oliver Stone’s film Is President Richard M. Nixon, as portrayed in the film, a Machiavellian politician? You may
argue for or against Machiavelli and/or Nixon, if you wish. If you are arguing against Machiavelli, you may use
examples of Nixon’s failures (such as the Watergate scandal and the bombing of Cambodia) to support your
argument. If you are arguing in favor of Machiavelli, you may use examples of Nixon’s successes (such as the
opening of friendly relations with China) to support your thesis.
Your own knowledge of politics and politicians. You may include information on the historical Richard M. Nixon,
and/or other historical or contemporary leaders (such as President Donald Trump).

 

 

 

 

Sample Solution

 

 

The Christian View of Revelation

By definition, the disclosure of Christian disclosure is to uncover realities and hypotheses through strict occasions recently covered up. For Christians, disclosure is essentially identified with God’s disclosure to his kin. God let us know, yet we additionally need to consider what he demonstrated us to us, and we pick whether to acknowledge his adoration . God didn’t leave us to us. The demonstration of his affection is as yet our inspiration to acknowledge God.

The translation of historism sees a wide perspective on the historical backdrop of the end times; interpretive understanding for the most part alludes to the period of the end of the world (the first century), or late occasions of the Roman Empire. Future decrease; Mirrorists accept that Apocalypse portrays future occasions; Apocalypse alludes to battle between otherworldly moral story and great and malevolence, not genuine individuals or occasions Idealism or representative understanding of.

The perspective on “representative history” (by and large the official perspective on the end of the world received by the archaic church) has been perused down to the Middle Ages. When all is said in done, these perspectives comprehend the long term perspective on the content. Subsequently, a few people have come to comprehend what’s going on throughout the entire existence of Christians by the perspective of such Apocalypse. This understanding style considers the late occasion as having accomplished ‘figure’ throughout the entire existence of Christianity. In the end of the world, it is known as the “nonstop history” see.

Thomas Aquinas initially portrayed nonexclusive disclosure and unique disclosure with two Christian disclosures. General disclosure happens by watching the request in which they are made. These perceptions can consistently infer significant ends, for example, the presence of God and qualities of God. General disclosure is additionally component of Christian ‘s statement of regret hypothesis. Explicit subtleties, for example, trinity and manifestation have been clarified in the lessons of the Bible and can not be induced except if enlivened specifically.

From one viewpoint, a countryman accepts that transformative science and philosophy are viable and treat them as reciprocal disclosures of God. Since God is his own particular disclosure in Christian confidence and is additionally basically the wellspring of his overall disclosure, the revelation of science and philosophy can not genuinely negate, logical inconsistency is evident It must be. It is devoted to God’s answer for reality. Nicozisin (Fr. George) is viable

 

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.