Sample Solution

The ethical dilemma I have chosen to discuss is the potential conflict between a healthcare provider’s duty of care and the patient’s right to autonomy in making decisions about their own health. This dilemma can occur when a patient refuses to accept or follow recommended treatments for medical conditions despite warnings from their doctor regarding possible risks and consequences (Miller & Grody , 2021). Though it is important for patients to make autonomous decisions, it can be difficult for providers who must balance this need with ensuring that they act in the best interests of their patients by providing necessary care.

One ethical principle relevant to this dilemma is beneficence – which is defined as an obligation of healthcare professionals to promote good and prevent harm (Beauchamp & Childress , 2009). As such, it requires them take appropriate steps towards protecting their patients whilst also allowing individuals retain sufficient decision-making power over themselves. Additionally, Nonmaleficience – described as avoiding any action which may cause intentional or unintentional injury – should also be considered (Beauchamp & Childress , 2009). In situations where treatment refusal could lead to detrimental outcomes doctors must exercise caution by assessing whether any methods used are necessary but also not overly intrusive on individual freedoms.

In conclusion, when healthcare providers face conflicts between duties of care and patient autonomy they should strive to adhere to both legal requirements and ethical standards such as beneficence and nonmaleficience when determining how to handle each situation. Doing so will allow them meet their professional obligations while still respecting individual rights thus avoiding unnecessary suffering or harm caused either way.