ill choose an nursing ethical dilemma you faced or choose a situation from textbook attached (Butts & Rich: Chapters 4,5,6, 7) and address all items listed below.
Definition of the dilemma-what is the ethical dilemma and what are the possible choices to make in the ethical dilemma?
Purpose of the paper clearly stated
Significance of the topic why is this topic important?
Framework model used for decision making. Model is summarized and process for using is explained; assigned ethical dilemma is evaluated using this framework and process.
Ethical principles used to guide the decision-List all ethical principles that are applicable in making a decision regarding the assigned ethical dilemma. Autonomy, justice, beneficence, and nonmaleficence are examples of ethical principles that must be considered in the decision. Use of the ANA website is a resource that guides in identifying personal ethical standards.
Literature review that supports each side of the ethical decision
Relationship of the dilemma decision with family and significant others- Contextual issues are defined.
Student’s personal beliefs are discussed with references that support those beliefs.
Purpose of the paper and key findings are summarized.
Headings you should have in your paper include
Introduction
Definition of the Dilemma
Significance of the Topic
Framework Model Used for Decision Making
Ethical Principles Used to Guide the Decision
Relationship of the Dilemma Decision with Family and Significant Others
Conclusion
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the ethical implications of denying medical care based on a lack of insurance coverage with regards to an individual’s right to access essential healthcare services. By examining both sides of this issue, my aim is to come up with an ethical solution that respects both moral principles and legal guidelines.
This topic is particularly relevant in healthcare today as more people are unable or unwilling to purchase health insurance due its increasing cost and complexity. This has created an environment where access to necessary medical treatments become increasingly difficult for those without financial means or insurance coverage. Furthermore, addressing this problem must also take into account legal considerations such as state laws regarding hospitals’ responsibility in providing emergency services regardless of ability-to-pay (Butts & Rich 2014). Thus, acknowledging its importance in providing quality healthcare services while complying with legal requirements requires thoughtful consideration from nurses and other healthcare professionals involved in making decisions related to patients lacking insurance coverage.
Vittola, first and foremost, talks about one of the noble motivations of war, above all, is when mischief is incurred however he causes notice the damage doesn’t prompt conflict, it relies upon the degree or proportionality, one more condition to jus promotion bellum (Begby et al (2006b), Page 314). Frowe, nonetheless, contends the possibility of “worthy motivation” in view of “Power” which alludes to the security of political and regional freedoms, alongside basic liberties. In contemporary view, this view is more confounded to reply, given the ascent of globalization. Additionally, it is challenging to gauge proportionality, especially in war, on the grounds that not just that there is an epistemic issue in ascertaining, yet again the present world has created (Frowe (2011), Page 54-6). Besides, Vittola contends war is essential, not just for cautious purposes, ‘since it is legitimate to oppose force with force,’ yet additionally to battle against the crooked, a hostile conflict, countries which are not rebuffed for acting treacherously towards its own kin or have unjustifiably taken land from the home country (Begby et al (2006b), Page 310&313); to “show its foes a thing or two,” yet for the most part to accomplish the point of war. This approves Aristotle’s contention: ‘there should be battle for harmony (Aristotle (1996), Page 187). Nonetheless, Frowe contends “self-preservation” has a majority of portrayals, found in Chapter 1, demonstrating the way that self-protection can’t necessarily in every case legitimize one’s activities. Considerably more dangerous, is the situation of self-preservation in war, where two clashing perspectives are laid out: The Collectivists, an entirely different hypothesis and the Individualists, the continuation of the homegrown hypothesis of self-protection (Frowe (2011), Page 9& 29-34). All the more significantly, Frowe discredits Vittola’s view on retribution in light of the fact that right off the bat it enables the punisher’s position, yet additionally the present world forestalls this activity between nations through legitimate bodies like the UN, since we have modernized into a somewhat tranquil society (Frowe (2011), Page 80-1). In particular, Frowe further discredits Vittola through his case that ‘right aim can’t be blamed so as to take up arms in light of expected wrong,’ proposing we can’t simply hurt another on the grounds that they have accomplished something uncalled for. Different elements should be thought of, for instance, Proportionality. Thirdly, Vittola contends that war ought to be kept away from (Begby et al (2006b), Page 332) and that we ought to continue conditions carefully. This is upheld by the “last resor