Ethics and Rigor of Proposed Intervention Study

 

Building the proposed pilot study designed in the previous module.

Discuss the ethical considerations that will need to be considered when implementing the innovation to generate evidence to address the CMS quality indicator.
Focus on the threats to the reliability and validity of the proposed pilot study.
Discuss strategies to control threats to internal and external validity.

 

Sample Solution

When implementing the pilot study to address the CMS quality indicator, several ethical considerations must be taken into account:

  • Informed Consent: Participants must provide informed consent, understanding the purpose of the study, potential risks and benefits, and their right to withdraw at any time.
  • Privacy and Confidentiality: The privacy and confidentiality of participant data must be protected. This includes ensuring that data is stored securely and that appropriate measures are taken to prevent unauthorized access.
  • Beneficence: The study should maximize benefits for participants and minimize harm. This means carefully considering the potential risks and benefits of the innovation and taking steps to mitigate any negative consequences.
  • Justice: The study should be conducted equitably, ensuring that participants from different backgrounds have equal access and that no group is unfairly burdened.

Threats to Reliability and Validity

  • Reliability: The consistency and dependability of the study’s measures and results. Threats to reliability include:
    • Measurement error: Inaccurate or inconsistent measurement of variables.
    • Observer bias: The researcher’s subjective interpretations influencing the data.
    • Test-retest reliability: The consistency of results over time.
  • Validity: The extent to which the study measures what it intends to measure. Threats to validity include:
    • Internal validity: The extent to which the study can establish a causal relationship between the intervention and the outcome. Threats include:
      • Selection bias: Differences between groups before the intervention.
      • History: External events affecting the outcome.
      • Maturation: Changes in participants over time.
    • External validity: The extent to which the study’s findings can be generalized to other populations and settings. Threats include:
      • Selection bias: The sample may not be representative of the target population.
      • Setting: The study may not be conducted in a realistic setting.
      • History: External events may limit the generalizability of findings.

Strategies to Control Threats

  • Reliability:
    • Use standardized measures and training for researchers.
    • Implement quality control procedures to ensure data accuracy.
    • Conduct pilot testing to assess the reliability of measures.
  • Internal Validity:
    • Use a randomized controlled trial design to control for selection bias.
    • Control for history and maturation by using a comparison group.
    • Implement blinding to minimize observer bias.
  • External Validity:
    • Use a diverse sample to improve generalizability.
    • Conduct the study in multiple settings to assess external validity.
    • Consider the potential for interaction effects between the intervention and other factors.

By carefully addressing these ethical considerations and controlling for threats to reliability and validity, the pilot study can generate credible evidence to inform the implementation of the innovation and address the CMS quality indicator.

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer