Evaluating special education teachers

 

As a principal, you will be responsible for observing and evaluating special education teachers. This process will include pre-conferences, observations, and feedback. To maximize effectiveness, this process must be collaborative, clear, and complete.

Allocate at least 1 hour in the field to support this field experience.

In collaboration with your principal mentor, attend a pre-conference and formal observation of a special education teacher. With your principal mentor, collaboratively reflect upon the teacher’s performance including agreed upon ideas for enhancing instructional delivery and student learning outcomes. Discuss how feedback would be delivered in a post-observation conference. In addition, examine the formal evaluation tool, policies regarding how the tool is administered, how ratings are assigned, how and with whom results are shared, and what happens with the results? Are any of these different for a special education teacher compared to the general educator?

 

Sample Solution

The pre-conference is an important part of the evaluation process for special education teachers because it provides an opportunity to discuss expectations and clarify any confusion before the formal observation. During this meeting, the principal should ensure that both parties understand what is expected from the teacher during the lesson, as well as how they will be observed and evaluated (Foegen & Latham, 2007). This discussion should also involve a review of any policies or procedures related to evaluation protocols, such as how ratings are assigned and results shared with stakeholders (Foegen & Latham, 2007).

Once all necessary information has been discussed and established during the pre-conference meeting, observations can begin. While observing a special education teacher in action, principals should focus on not only instructional strategies used but also classroom environment such as student engagement levels and behavior management techniques (Gulamhussein & Kaczala 2002). In addition to these areas of focus ,principals must carefully observe if accommodations have been put in place for students who require them .( Gulamhussein & Kaczala 2002 ) As these observations take place , notes may be taken to help guide conversations later on .

Following observations , feedback must be provided in order for improvement plans to be developed . Feedback should be provided through post -observation conferences which involve ongoing dialogue between principal and teacher about their performance ( Foegen & Latham 2007 ). Clear explanations regarding ratings received along with specific examples offered by principals can help teachers gain better insights into their strengths weaknesses while allowing them to take ownership over their professional development plan.( Foegen & Latham 2007)

In summary, pre-conference meetings are necessary prior to conducting evaluations so that expectations are clear . Observations then follow where key areas such as accommodation provision ,student engagement levels ,instructional strategy use should serve as focal points. Post observation conferences involving feedback delivery based upon rating scores allow for improved understanding among educators followed by goal setting for continued progress ( Gulamhussein & Kaczala 2002 ; Foegen & Latham 2007 ).

 

nowledge and learn new things, called spiraling. A benefit of this approach is that understudies who reviewed a great deal of information started to platform their friends and examination with code without being cognizant they were making it happen. They were examining key highlights of Python and conveyed well together. A disadvantage of this technique could be said that one of my understudies has not covered Python previously, thusly isn’t returning to information however making new information. I didn’t find this to ruin progress because of understudies conveying and sharing their all around existing information framework their companions. (Platform REFERENCE)

Involving a flipped approach for this example by utilizing worksheet 1 (Index) considered all understudies to gain exceptional headway. Examination into flipped maths educating, did by Public Underpinning of Instructive Exploration (NEFR, 2015) created proof that flipped learning permits additional opportunity for dynamic class learning, cooperative learning and class discussion.(date) Class conversations are a major piece of understudies having the option to convey really to extend their seeing likewise supporting the improvement of proficiency. Proficiency isn’t just about perusing and composing yet having the option to impart. (The Public Education Trust, 2014).

Besides, understudies started to assume a sense of ownership with their own work, at their own speed, bringing about a more profound comprehension. Albeit this study was focused on a maths climate, I concur with these discoveries. This strategy for helping permitted me to do individual training with select understudies and understudies started taking responsibility for own realizing which thusly was building their strength to critical thinking. Vygotsky (1978) states that, ‘By giving our understudies practice in conversing with others, we give them outlines for thinking all alone.’ To help Vygotsky’s assertion, I checked understudy’s verbal and non-verbal correspondences to see the improvement of understudies starting to finish programming undertakings on their own utilizing the techniques spread out in this first example. Unquestionably before the second’s over illustration, understudies were starting to have an independent perspective. Advancing BY DISCVOERY. Public CURRICULUM????

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.