Evaluation plan to measure efficacy of the proposed intervention.

 

Reduce the rate of death from any cause in adults with diabetes — D‑09
Based on this objective you would develop a more specific evidence-based intervention

Gathering the Evidence

Besides the resources available in the topic areas of Healthy People 2030, visit South’s Online Library and conduct a review of literature looking for nursing research related to health promotion and disease prevention in your selected topic area. Also visit reputable internet sources such as the CDC, NINR, AHRQ.

Criteria:

Clearly describes the health promotion/disease prevention problem specific to the target population.
Explain how the selected problem applies to advanced practice in the nurse practitioner role
Critically analyze the current literature related to interventions that address the problem related to communities from nursing, the sciences, and humanities.
Select an appropriate health promotion/disease prevention theoretical framework that applies to the problem.
Design an intervention to address the problem in the selected population/setting using appropriate epidemiological, social, and environmental assessments.
Design an evaluation plan to measure efficacy of the proposed intervention.

Sample Solution

Despite the fact that tax assessment has its reasonable advantages, it’s anything but an ideal mediation to address the unmistakable market disappointment that is happening. Initially, the versatility of interest for red meat should be considered. In the event that the interest for red meat is profoundly inelastic, it will deliver the duty futile in light of the fact that the slight expansion in the cost of red meats will significantly affect interest. In a 2011study it was assessed that the uncompensated cost flexibilities for hamburger and pork (famous red meats) in 2009 was – 0.594 and – 0.779 separately, meaning they are both cost inelastic (Tiffin et al 2011). Consequently the assessment is probably going to affect utilization since customers will in any case purchase red meats like hamburger and pork notwithstanding the ascent in cost.

As found in Figure 2, in the outline on the right, we see a decent with a cost inelastic interest, for example, is the situation for meat and pork. At the point when an assessment is carried out on supply from S1 to S + charge the fall in amount from Q1 to Q2 is substantially less critical than that in the chart on the left. In this manner the public authority can’t rest assured how powerful the assessment is probably going to be.

One more issue with tax assessment as a type of government mediation is that there might be trouble setting the right worth of the duty. Assuming the financial worth of the negative externality of red meat utilization is difficult to gauge then it could be set excessively high or low. For instance, on the off chance that the duty rate is set too low, the assessment will be insufficient particularly when combined with the way that most red meats have a cost inelastic requests. Purchasers will be undeterred by the expense yet purchase red meat as they regularly would. Nonetheless, on the off chance that the assessment is set too high, this makes a motivating force for purchasers to try not to pay the expense through means, for example, “smuggling”. This won’t be great for the public authority and they are probably going to need to execute rigid guidelines to stop this

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.