Evidence Based Practice

 

Respond with minimum of 3–5 sentences in length.

In working with your team, what did you find difficult about writing your PICO or PICo question?
What strategies did you use to collaborate with your team members?
What was your experience like in learning to search for evidence pertaining to your clinical question?
What do you anticipate being some of the advantages of working with a team to solve clinical problems, and what do you believe will be the disadvantages?
As you prepared to write your clinical question, what was the most challenging part of appraising sources?
Rubric Grading
Level 4 Demonstration of Knowledge and Understanding of Content:
The content reveals pertinent and thoughtful information. They expertly show evidence of knowledge and understanding of content.
Level 4 Critical Thinking and Substance of Responses:
Strong evidence of critical thinking is demonstrated. Thoughtful and complete responses are added that directly address all aspects of the topic, offer an extension of the original and alternative point of view to foster further discussion.
Academic Languages: Excellent use and control of language. Superior use of style and variety provided in a professional tone.
Formatting: Formatting follows assignment directions required, with no errors. Citations provided with no errors.
References:
Hopp, L., & Rittenmeyer, L. (2020). Introduction to evidence-based practice: A practical guide for nursing (2nd ed.). F. A.
Davis Company
• American Psychological Association. (2019). APA Style. Retrieved from https://apastyle.apa.org/

Sample Solution

According to the Journal of Nursing Administration, evidence-based practice (EBP) is a type of healthcare that uses the most up-to-date research to improve patient health and safety while lowering overall costs and minimizing variation in health outcomes. It is a problem-solving approach that incorporates best practices from the most recent medical literature, clinical experience, and the values and preferences of the people being treated. Although EBP was just recently integrated into current nursing practice, beginning in the 1990s, its roots in nursing history are deep. While most of the literature credits physician Archie Cochrane with inventing EBP (then known as evidence-based medicine) in the 1970s,

he end of World War 2 is an immediate outcome from the bombs being dropped as Japan couldn’t practically continue to battle on with their country in such a lot of annihilation. There was additionally the danger of one more forceful reply from the USA and they couldn’t gamble with that, accordingly their most ideal choice was to give up.

One more impact of the bombarding was the counter atomic approach that spread across the world.

Since the time the bombarding an enemy of atomic development has spread across the world. Hibakusha, meaning overcomers of the bombings, have been a focal voice in this work and a suggestion to many individuals the detestations that happened in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Since the time the occasion, there has been hostile to atomic fights and revitalizes all through the world, incorporating the biggest in New York in 1982 where 1,000,000 individuals walked against Nuclear Weapons. In 2010 there was first discussion about a settlement in regards to Nuclear Weapons, yet it didn’t go through as it was gone against by a few strong countries that upheld Nuclear Weapons, like the USA. Discussions carried on for a really long time after as well as recommendations being presented and dismissed, until July 2017 when the Treaty on Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons passed, but is yet to be active as it needs 50 confirmations until it is dynamic and it just has 10 up to this point. The settlement is certainly a positive development, but just applies to nations that marked the arrangement and every one of the states with the most broad atomic weapons stores, for example, the USA and Russia boycotted the deal. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki made the world mindful of the annihilation that atomic fighting reason and started developments across the globe. It surely had a constructive outcome in the manner that 15 nations have no atomic powerplants and have promised to remain as such and that 8 nations have swore to progressively get rid of atomic power. The world actually has approaches as far as becoming atomic free however the annihilation in Hiroshima and Nagasaki has ignited a development that is rolling out enormous improvements.

This enemy of atomic development is an outcome from the bombings on the grounds that the annihilation caused made the world and individuals mindful of the truth of Nuclear War.

One more impact of the besieging is the enduring impacts of the radiation and individuals that are as yet impacted today.

Beside the a large number of individuals who kicked the bucket in the underlying impact, there has been individuals biting the dust from that point onward from different complexities because of openness to radiation. Five years after the besieging, the pace of leukemia had observably expanded, research done by the Center for Environmental Health Studies later has connected openness to Ionizing Radiations to disease. About 10 years after the bombarding increments

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.